On 2018-Nov-4, at 1:06 AM, Thomas Zander wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Sep 2017 at 01:37, Mark Millard wrote:
>
>> [I show some of the target/ppc/translate.c source code
>> and related material this time. Not that I know enough
>> to patch it correctly.]
>
> This is still an issue, correct?
> I tried to
[I show some of the target/ppc/translate.c source code
and related material this time. Not that I know enough
to patch it correctly.]
On 2017-Aug-31, at 12:13 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
> [Turns out that the emulated program counter is not progressing
> for syscall emulation, at least for [some] sy
[Just adding Sean Bruno in case the information is new to him.
I top post a note for that.]
Sean: The below reports on what I've found for what is
happening for qemu-ppc64-static (and possibly others) when
it gets stuck eating CPU time (and leaking memory), at least
for the example I ran into (tha
[Turns out that the emulated program counter is not progressing
for syscall emulation, at least for syscall falure cases.]
On 2017-Aug-30, at 8:43 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
> On 2017-Aug-30, at 4:32 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
>
>> On 30 Aug, Mark Millard wrote:
>>> On 2017-Aug-30, at 4:00 AM, Mark Lin
On 2017-Aug-30, at 4:32 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 30 Aug, Mark Millard wrote:
>> On 2017-Aug-30, at 4:00 AM, Mark Linimon wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 03:09:40AM -0700, Mark Millard wrote:
It appears that qemu-ppc64-static and qemu-ppc-static from
emulators/qemu-user-static a
On 30 Aug, Mark Millard wrote:
> On 2017-Aug-30, at 4:00 AM, Mark Linimon wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 03:09:40AM -0700, Mark Millard wrote:
>>> It appears that qemu-ppc64-static and qemu-ppc-static from
>>> emulators/qemu-user-static are broken.
>>
>> Correct, and known for some time. (
On 2017-Aug-30, at 4:00 AM, Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 03:09:40AM -0700, Mark Millard wrote:
>> It appears that qemu-ppc64-static and qemu-ppc-static from
>> emulators/qemu-user-static are broken.
>
> Correct, and known for some time. (fwiw sparc64 hangs as well.)
Looks like
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 03:09:40AM -0700, Mark Millard wrote:
> It appears that qemu-ppc64-static and qemu-ppc-static from
> emulators/qemu-user-static are broken.
Correct, and known for some time. (fwiw sparc64 hangs as well.)
mcl
___
freebsd-ports@fr
SWAP STATE C TIME CPU
COMMAND
47842 root 2 1030 16597M 455M 0K CPU11 5:25 96.38%
/usr/local/bin/qemu-ppc-static /bin/ps -ww -p 47841 -o jid=
By contrast I've no such problem with qemu-arm-static or
qemu-aarch64-static : these were able to build lang/gcc7
(ful
If you want to cross-compile, you need
* a proper toolchain
* a project that's enable to produce cross-compiled binaries
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 8:04 PM, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> On 08/22/17 18:03, Luca Pizzamiglio wrote:
>>
>> yes, the qemu emulation of other architecture means that the CPU is
Andrea Venturoli writes:
> On 08/17/17 21:22, Jan Beich wrote:
>> That page is a bit out of date. Nowadays building for aarch64 is as simple as
>>
>>$ pkg install poudriere qemu-user-static
>>$ service qemu_user_static onestart
>>$ poudriere jail -cj 111aarch64 -a arm64.aarch64 -v 11.
On 08/22/17 18:03, Luca Pizzamiglio wrote:
yes, the qemu emulation of other architecture means that the CPU is
emulated by software, that's really expensive.
You should consider around 10x slower or even more. ccache can help a
lot in this case.
Thanks.
So you are confirming my poudriere is run
yes, the qemu emulation of other architecture means that the CPU is
emulated by software, that's really expensive.
You should consider around 10x slower or even more. ccache can help a
lot in this case.
Best regards,
Luca
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 7:40 AM, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> On 08/17/17 21
On 08/17/17 21:22, Jan Beich wrote:
Yep. Link the binary (i.e. "date") statically or run it inside jail/chroot.
Otherwise, /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 references the host system, which on amd64
wouldn't recognize aarch64 shared libraries.
Thanks a lot.
Now it seems so obvious to me, but I really woul
(Redirected from
https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2017-August/278443.html )
Andrea Venturoli writes:
>> # file date
>> date: ELF 64-bit MSB executable, MIPS, MIPS-III version 1 (FreeBSD),
>> statically linked, FreeBSD-style, for FreeBSD 10.0 (127),
>> stripped
>> # ./da
15 matches
Mail list logo
