Am 03.04.2013 um 16:29 schrieb Stefan Bethke :
> Am 03.04.2013 um 14:02 schrieb Stefan Bethke:
>
> (Setup with system ports tree and FTP-installed 9.1-RELEASE excluded)
>
>> >> Starting jail 91amd64
>> realpath: /freebsd/checkout/ports/distfiles: No such file or directory
>> >> Mounting
Am 03.04.2013 um 14:02 schrieb Stefan Bethke:
(Setup with system ports tree and FTP-installed 9.1-RELEASE excluded)
> >> Starting jail 91amd64
> realpath: /freebsd/checkout/ports/distfiles: No such file or directory
> >> Mounting ports from: /freebsd/checkout/ports
> >> Mounting packa
Am 03.04.2013 um 13:30 schrieb Bryan Drewery:
>> I've had some trouble with poudriere not mounting things where they belong.
>> I manually created /usr/ports and /wrkdirs and recreated the "clean"
>> snapshot. This worked around the "mount: no such file or directory"
>> problems, but I guess
On 4/3/2013 6:26 AM, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> Am 03.04.2013 um 12:53 schrieb Bryan Drewery:
>
>> On 4/3/2013 4:17 AM, Stefan Bethke wrote:
>>> Firstly, is there a better mailing list to discuss poudriere?
>>>
>>> I'm just getting my feet wet with poudriere, and are a bit surprised that
>>> all depe
Am 03.04.2013 um 12:53 schrieb Bryan Drewery:
> On 4/3/2013 4:17 AM, Stefan Bethke wrote:
>> Firstly, is there a better mailing list to discuss poudriere?
>>
>> I'm just getting my feet wet with poudriere, and are a bit surprised that
>> all dependencies for a port are built, instead of installi
On 4/3/2013 4:17 AM, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> Firstly, is there a better mailing list to discuss poudriere?
>
> I'm just getting my feet wet with poudriere, and are a bit surprised that all
> dependencies for a port are built, instead of installing the packages that
> got built earlier already. I
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 11:20:15AM +0200, John Marino wrote:
> On 4/3/2013 11:17, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> > Firstly, is there a better mailing list to discuss poudriere?
> >
> > I'm just getting my feet wet with poudriere, and are a bit surprised that
> > all dependencies for a port are built, inst
On 4/3/2013 11:17, Stefan Bethke wrote:
Firstly, is there a better mailing list to discuss poudriere?
I'm just getting my feet wet with poudriere, and are a bit surprised that all
dependencies for a port are built, instead of installing the packages that got
built earlier already. Is this int
Firstly, is there a better mailing list to discuss poudriere?
I'm just getting my feet wet with poudriere, and are a bit surprised that all
dependencies for a port are built, instead of installing the packages that got
built earlier already. Is this intentional? Is there a configuration option
