On 09/02/2014 23:09, Russell L. Carter wrote:
>
>
> On 09/02/14 04:05, Alex Dupre wrote:
>> Russell L. Carter ha scritto:
>>> However, what I would like to learn is if poudriere
>>> is able to understand DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=YES, and if so, how to
>>> enable it. I'm not asking a political que
On 09/02/14 04:05, Alex Dupre wrote:
> Russell L. Carter ha scritto:
>> However, what I would like to learn is if poudriere
>> is able to understand DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=YES, and if so, how to
>> enable it. I'm not asking a political question here, just a technical
>> one. If this is possibl
Russell L. Carter ha scritto:
> However, what I would like to learn is if poudriere
> is able to understand DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=YES, and if so, how to
> enable it. I'm not asking a political question here, just a technical
> one. If this is possible, how do I do it?
NO_IGNORE= yes
--
On 09/01/14 18:29, Chuck Burns wrote:
> On Monday, September 01, 2014 5:17:06 PM Russell L. Carter wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> root@terpsichore> cat /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/make.conf
>> #
>> DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=YES
>> root@terpsichore>
>>
>> Running poudriere I see that it does indeed conca
On Monday, September 01, 2014 5:17:06 PM Russell L. Carter wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> root@terpsichore> cat /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/make.conf
> #
> DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=YES
> root@terpsichore>
>
> Running poudriere I see that it does indeed concatenate
> that make.conf into its configuration.
Greetings,
root@terpsichore> cat /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/make.conf
#
DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=YES
root@terpsichore>
Running poudriere I see that it does indeed concatenate
that make.conf into its configuration. But all those rotten,
terrible, awful buggy ancient security-nightmare linux-f10
po