Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 14/07/2008 15:18 Sergey Matveychuk said the following:
version 2.8 is alway > than 2.6. So you must use -f option here:
portupgrade -fo www/neon26 neon28
portupgrade will no update ports on older version if you did not force it.
yes, -f does the job, thanks!
But, on t
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 02:46:02PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 14/07/2008 14:32 Sergey Matveychuk said the following:
> >
> > This command works:
> > # portupgrade -o www/neon28 neon26
> >
> > I'll fix UPDATING entry.
>
> Is the reverse operation supposed to work?
>
> $ pkg_glob neon\*
> ne
on 14/07/2008 15:18 Sergey Matveychuk said the following:
>
> version 2.8 is alway > than 2.6. So you must use -f option here:
>
> portupgrade -fo www/neon26 neon28
>
> portupgrade will no update ports on older version if you did not force it.
>
yes, -f does the job, thanks!
But, on the other
Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 14/07/2008 14:57 Sergey Matveychuk said the following:
Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 14/07/2008 14:32 Sergey Matveychuk said the following:
This command works:
# portupgrade -o www/neon28 neon26
I'll fix UPDATING entry.
Is the reverse operation supposed to work?
$ pkg_glob n
on 14/07/2008 14:57 Sergey Matveychuk said the following:
> Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 14/07/2008 14:32 Sergey Matveychuk said the following:
>>> This command works:
>>> # portupgrade -o www/neon28 neon26
>>>
>>> I'll fix UPDATING entry.
>>
>> Is the reverse operation supposed to work?
>>
>> $ pkg_g
Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 14/07/2008 14:32 Sergey Matveychuk said the following:
This command works:
# portupgrade -o www/neon28 neon26
I'll fix UPDATING entry.
Is the reverse operation supposed to work?
$ pkg_glob neon\*
neon28-0.28.2_1
$ portupgrade -o www/neon26 neon28
$ portupgrade -o www/n
on 14/07/2008 14:32 Sergey Matveychuk said the following:
>
> This command works:
> # portupgrade -o www/neon28 neon26
>
> I'll fix UPDATING entry.
Is the reverse operation supposed to work?
$ pkg_glob neon\*
neon28-0.28.2_1
$ portupgrade -o www/neon26 neon28
$ portupgrade -o www/neon26 www/neo
Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 12/07/2008 01:01 Sergey Matveychuk said the following:
Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 10/07/2008 11:18 Yuri said the following:
David Southwell wrote:
Did you follow the instructions in UPDATING (see below)?
They may have some bearing on the problem.
20
on 12/07/2008 01:01 Sergey Matveychuk said the following:
Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 10/07/2008 11:18 Yuri said the following:
David Southwell wrote:
Did you follow the instructions in UPDATING (see below)?
They may have some bearing on the problem.
20080701:
AFFECTS: us
Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 10/07/2008 11:18 Yuri said the following:
David Southwell wrote:
Did you follow the instructions in UPDATING (see below)?
They may have some bearing on the problem.
20080701:
AFFECTS: users of devel/subversion*
AUTHOR: Lev Serebryakov <[EMAIL
Yuri wrote:
I got the error below during portupgrade -aP.
Why wouldn't portupgrade just upgrade neon?
'pkgdb -F' doesn;t find any problems.
Yuri
===> Installing for neon28-0.28.2_1
===> neon28-0.28.2_1 conflicts with installed package(s):
neon26-0.26.4_1
They install files into
on 10/07/2008 11:18 Yuri said the following:
> David Southwell wrote:
>> Did you follow the instructions in UPDATING (see below)?
>> They may have some bearing on the problem.
>>
>> 20080701:
>> AFFECTS: users of devel/subversion*
>> AUTHOR: Lev Serebryakov <[EMAIL PROT
And what about deinstall neon26 and install neon28 instead?
David Southwell wrote:
> Did you follow the instructions in UPDATING (see below)?
> They may have some bearing on the problem.
>
> 20080701:
> AFFECTS: users of devel/subversion*
> AUTHOR: Lev Serebryakov <[EM
And what about deinstall neon26 and install neon28 instead?
David Southwell wrote:
> Did you follow the instructions in UPDATING (see below)?
> They may have some bearing on the problem.
>
> 20080701:
> AFFECTS: users of devel/subversion*
> AUTHOR: Lev Serebryakov <[EM
David Southwell wrote:
Did you follow the instructions in UPDATING (see below)?
They may have some bearing on the problem.
20080701:
AFFECTS: users of devel/subversion*
AUTHOR: Lev Serebryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
subversion now uses neon-0.28.x (www/neon28) port, a
On Wednesday 09 July 2008 15:09:25 Yuri wrote:
> I got the error below during portupgrade -aP.
>
> Why wouldn't portupgrade just upgrade neon?
>
> 'pkgdb -F' doesn;t find any problems.
>
> Yuri
>
> ===> Installing for neon28-0.28.2_1
>
> ===> neon28-0.28.2_1 conflicts with installed package(s):
>
I got the error below during portupgrade -aP.
Why wouldn't portupgrade just upgrade neon?
'pkgdb -F' doesn;t find any problems.
Yuri
===> Installing for neon28-0.28.2_1
===> neon28-0.28.2_1 conflicts with installed package(s):
neon26-0.26.4_1
They install files into the same plac
17 matches
Mail list logo
