Re: portupgrade and gnupg update

2006-12-29 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Vasil Dimov wrote: > Hi, > > Currently I get this: > > % portversion -v gnupg > gnupg-1.4.6_2 < needs updating (port has 2.0.1) > gnupg-2.0.1 = up-to-date with port > % You did not show origins here. It can be an answer. I think they both were security/gnupg. >

Re: portupgrade and gnupg update

2006-12-27 Thread Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH
On Dec 27, 2006, at 5:04 , Vasil Dimov wrote: Currently I get this: % portversion -v gnupg gnupg-1.4.6_2 < needs updating (port has 2.0.1) gnupg-2.0.1 = up-to-date with port % This is incorrect and is caused by the fact that portupgrade is not aware that securi

portupgrade and gnupg update

2006-12-27 Thread Vasil Dimov
Hi, Currently I get this: % portversion -v gnupg gnupg-1.4.6_2 < needs updating (port has 2.0.1) gnupg-2.0.1 = up-to-date with port % This is incorrect and is caused by the fact that portupgrade is not aware that security/gnupg has been moved to security/gnupg1.