Hi Olli,
On 7-6-2012 16:59, Olli Hauer wrote:
> I don't think it is practical to patch all the ports like
> like bacula , spamd and others to not use getservbyname
> and hardcode the required ports?
I've got a preliminary patch that I'm going to submit upstream that
enables services support in n
On 2012-06-07 16:46, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 06/07/2012 07:37 AM, Olli Hauer wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> during an update to 8.3 I notice mergemaster from 8.3 is
>> building a database from /etc/services with services_mkdb.
>>
>> However the ports framework does not provide an automation
>> to rebuild this
On 06/07/2012 07:37 AM, Olli Hauer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> during an update to 8.3 I notice mergemaster from 8.3 is
> building a database from /etc/services with services_mkdb.
>
> However the ports framework does not provide an automation
> to rebuild this database, even I haven't seen any port which
>
Hi,
during an update to 8.3 I notice mergemaster from 8.3 is
building a database from /etc/services with services_mkdb.
However the ports framework does not provide an automation
to rebuild this database, even I haven't seen any port which
triggers a rebuild.
So my questions:
- should ports take
