On 10/5/2012 3:24 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Using pkg(ng) in conjunction with the port ports/mgmt/portupgrade
> results in long waiting cycles when portupgrade is updating the local
> database, it is even on fast boxes sometimes in the range of a minute or
> even two.
>
> Is this usual or is there
On Fri, 05 Oct 2012 10:47:33 -0500
Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 10/5/2012 10:40 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
> > Am 10/05/12 17:28, schrieb Bryan Drewery:
> >> On 10/5/2012 3:24 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
> >>> Using pkg(ng) in conjunction with the port ports/mgmt/portupgrade
> >>> results in long waiting c
On 10/5/2012 10:40 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Am 10/05/12 17:28, schrieb Bryan Drewery:
>> On 10/5/2012 3:24 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
>>> Using pkg(ng) in conjunction with the port ports/mgmt/portupgrade
>>> results in long waiting cycles when portupgrade is updating the local
>>> database, it is even
Am 10/05/12 17:28, schrieb Bryan Drewery:
> On 10/5/2012 3:24 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
>> Using pkg(ng) in conjunction with the port ports/mgmt/portupgrade
>> results in long waiting cycles when portupgrade is updating the local
>> database, it is even on fast boxes sometimes in the range of a minute
On 10/5/2012 3:24 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Using pkg(ng) in conjunction with the port ports/mgmt/portupgrade
> results in long waiting cycles when portupgrade is updating the local
> database, it is even on fast boxes sometimes in the range of a minute or
> even two.
You mean ports-mgmt/portupgrad
Using pkg(ng) in conjunction with the port ports/mgmt/portupgrade
results in long waiting cycles when portupgrade is updating the local
database, it is even on fast boxes sometimes in the range of a minute or
even two.
Is this usual or is there something wrong with my setup?
Regards,
Oliver
---
