Re: portmaster and meaning of --show-work / confirm to proceed

2010-02-07 Thread Doug Barton
On 01/29/10 13:12, Miroslav Lachman wrote: I have one small bug report (unfortunately not much useful info) # portmaster textproc/pear-Spreadsheet_Excel_Writer devel/pear-OLE net/pear-Net_IDNA dns/pear-Net_DNS ===>>> The following actions will be taken if you choose to proceed: Install textproc

Re: portmaster and meaning of --show-work / confirm to proceed

2010-01-29 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Doug Barton wrote: On 1/25/2010 9:30 AM, Miroslav Lachman wrote: Doug Barton wrote: Funny you should mention that. :) The current svn version of portmaster (users/dougb/portmaster) has this exact feature, and it's almost ready to be committed to the port. It's currently on by default, and I ju

Re: portmaster and meaning of --show-work

2010-01-25 Thread Doug Barton
On 1/25/2010 9:30 AM, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > Doug Barton wrote: > >> Funny you should mention that. :) The current svn version of portmaster >> (users/dougb/portmaster) has this exact feature, and it's almost ready >> to be committed to the port. It's currently on by default, and I just >> need

Re: portmaster and meaning of --show-work

2010-01-25 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Doug Barton wrote: On 1/21/2010 6:08 AM, Miroslav Lachman wrote: [...] I am sorry to not reply earlier... The next step (non default) can be interactive run of portmaster for beginers with questions like: # portmaster php5-extensions The following ports will be updated or installed as part

Re: portmaster and meaning of --show-work

2010-01-21 Thread Doug Barton
On 1/21/2010 6:08 AM, Miroslav Lachman wrote: Hi, manpage of portmaster says: --show-work show what dependent ports are, and are not installed (implies -t). It is right behavior of this option, but I think its name is confusing. Yes, I've never liked the name, but I've never been able to come

portmaster and meaning of --show-work

2010-01-21 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Hi, manpage of portmaster says: --show-work show what dependent ports are, and are not installed (implies -t). It is right behavior of this option, but I think its name is confusing. I think it should be names something like "show-deps" or "show-installed-deps" instead of "show-work". The n