Am 25.09.2007 um 19:34 schrieb Dmitry Marakasov:
Is it OK to place GPL sources into the ports tree?
You "infect" the port, then. It doesn't matter if other parts of the
ports are already GPL but if this is the only GPL part, everybody
using this port's code has to make his use (of the GPL
* Markus Hitter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> I have a problem porting a piece of software that use
>> getline(char**, int*, FILE*). This function is only present in
>> glibc so I wonder what do I do in this case?
> Ideally, you'd replace getline()'s usage with something similar, like
> fgets(3).
Am 21.09.2007 um 18:22 schrieb Dmitry Marakasov:
I have a problem porting a piece of software that use
getline(char**, int*, FILE*). This function is only present in
glibc so I wonder what do I do in this case?
Ideally, you'd replace getline()'s usage with something similar, like
fgets(3).
* Tijl Coosemans ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > I have a problem porting a piece of software that use
> > getline(char**, int*, FILE*). This function is only present in glibc
> > so I wonder what do I do in this case? Maybe there is some port which
> > provides required functionality (like for exam
On Friday 21 September 2007 18:22:08 Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> I have a problem porting a piece of software that use
> getline(char**, int*, FILE*). This function is only present in glibc
> so I wonder what do I do in this case? Maybe there is some port which
> provides required functionality (like
Hi!
I have a problem porting a piece of software that use
getline(char**, int*, FILE*). This function is only present in
glibc so I wonder what do I do in this case? Maybe there is some
port which provides required functionality (like for example
argp-standalone)?
--
Best regards,
Dmitry Marak
