Re: pkg_version confused by architecutre in package name

2006-07-07 Thread [LoN]Kamikaze
Brooks Davis wrote: > On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 06:04:37PM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: >> Brooks Davis wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 11:01:43AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: Brooks Davis wrote: > On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 02:45:45AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: >> I normally run the comm

Re: pkg_version confused by architecutre in package name

2006-07-06 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 06:04:37PM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > > Brooks Davis wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 11:01:43AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > >> Brooks Davis wrote: > >>> On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 02:45:45AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > I normally run the command > # pkg_ve

Re: pkg_version confused by architecutre in package name

2006-07-06 Thread Vivek Khera
On Jul 6, 2006, at 11:24 AM, Brooks Davis wrote: Actually I think it's confused by the fact that the package name is "diablo-jdk" and the version is "freebsd6.i386.1.5.0.07.00". That's just plain bogus. So who is at fault? The ports infrastructure or the FreeBSD foundation? I don't know.

Re: pkg_version confused by architecutre in package name

2006-07-06 Thread [LoN]Kamikaze
Brooks Davis wrote: > On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 11:01:43AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: >> Brooks Davis wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 02:45:45AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: I normally run the command # pkg_version -Iv | grep \< before running 'portupgrade -a', to see what's going

Re: pkg_version confused by architecutre in package name

2006-07-06 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 11:01:43AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > Brooks Davis wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 02:45:45AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > >> I normally run the command > >> # pkg_version -Iv | grep \< > >> before running 'portupgrade -a', to see what's going to happen. This time >

Re: pkg_version confused by architecutre in package name

2006-07-06 Thread [LoN]Kamikaze
Brooks Davis wrote: > On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 02:45:45AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: >> I normally run the command >> # pkg_version -Iv | grep \< >> before running 'portupgrade -a', to see what's going to happen. This time I >> got the following output: >> >> diablo-jdk-freebsd6.i386.1.5.0.07.00

Re: pkg_version confused by architecutre in package name

2006-07-05 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 02:45:45AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > I normally run the command > # pkg_version -Iv | grep \< > before running 'portupgrade -a', to see what's going to happen. This time I > got the following output: > > diablo-jdk-freebsd6.i386.1.5.0.07.00 < needs updating (index

pkg_version confused by architecutre in package name

2006-07-05 Thread [LoN]Kamikaze
I normally run the command # pkg_version -Iv | grep \< before running 'portupgrade -a', to see what's going to happen. This time I got the following output: diablo-jdk-freebsd6.i386.1.5.0.07.00 < needs updating (index has 1.5.0.07.00) It seems that the tool is confused by the i386 in the pac