Re: pkg_version and portversion: ports version comparison weirdness

2011-12-18 Thread Conrad J. Sabatier
On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 10:06:48 -0800 Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 8:43 AM, Conrad J. Sabatier > wrote: > > Can anyone explain why I'm seeing the following? > > > > libX11-1.4.99.1                     <   needs updating (index has > > 1.4.4,1) > > > > How is it that version 1.4.99

Re: pkg_version and portversion: ports version comparison weirdness

2011-12-18 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 8:43 AM, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > Can anyone explain why I'm seeing the following? > > libX11-1.4.99.1                     <   needs updating (index has > 1.4.4,1) > > How is it that version 1.4.99.1 compares as "less than" 1.4.4,1? > Since when is 99 < 4? > > Is it the

Re: pkg_version and portversion: ports version comparison weirdness

2011-12-18 Thread Julien Laffaye
On 12/18/2011 17:43, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: Can anyone explain why I'm seeing the following? libX11-1.4.99.1

pkg_version and portversion: ports version comparison weirdness

2011-12-18 Thread Conrad J. Sabatier
Can anyone explain why I'm seeing the following? libX11-1.4.99.1 < needs updating (index has 1.4.4,1) How is it that version 1.4.99.1 compares as "less than" 1.4.4,1? Since when is 99 < 4? Is it the PORTEPOCH in 1.4.4,1 that's throwing a monkey wrench into the works? This