On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 26/11/2013 18:15, Warren Block wrote:
> > On Tue, 26 Nov 2013, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> >
> >> Possibly hijacking the thread, but isn't it time that pkg_libchk was
> >> made a
> >> part of the base system? It comes up over and over as a to
On 26/11/2013 18:15, Warren Block wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Nov 2013, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
>> Possibly hijacking the thread, but isn't it time that pkg_libchk was
>> made a
>> part of the base system? It comes up over and over as a tool to simplify
>> dealing with dealing with shareable library versio
On Tue, 26 Nov 2013, Kevin Oberman wrote:
Possibly hijacking the thread, but isn't it time that pkg_libchk was made a
part of the base system? It comes up over and over as a tool to simplify
dealing with dealing with shareable library version bumps and even more
important for dealing with the pr
