Dominic Fandrey writes:
> Boris Samorodov wrote:
>> Dominic Fandrey writes:
>>
Luck. The app linking to the old library will have a dependency on the old
version. pkg_add will find the origin, issue a warning about "app-1.0
needing
lib-0.1 but lib-0.2 is installed" and pro
Boris Samorodov wrote:
> Dominic Fandrey writes:
>
>>> Luck. The app linking to the old library will have a dependency on the old
>>> version. pkg_add will find the origin, issue a warning about "app-1.0
>>> needing
>>> lib-0.1 but lib-0.2 is installed" and proceed. app will not start, because
Dominic Fandrey writes:
>> Luck. The app linking to the old library will have a dependency on the old
>> version. pkg_add will find the origin, issue a warning about "app-1.0
>> needing
>> lib-0.1 but lib-0.2 is installed" and proceed. app will not start, because
>> of
>> the missing library
Mel Flynn wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 June 2009 07:34:47 Dominic Fandrey wrote:
>> Mel Flynn wrote:
>>> On Monday 15 June 2009 02:55:09 Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Sorry for the late reply, this was auto-sorted into the ports@ mails
and drowned there.
Boris Samorodov wrote:
> As I und
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 07:34:47 Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> Mel Flynn wrote:
> > On Monday 15 June 2009 02:55:09 Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> >> Sorry for the late reply, this was auto-sorted into the ports@ mails
> >> and drowned there.
> >>
> >> Boris Samorodov wrote:
> >>> As I understand pkg_upgrade
Mel Flynn wrote:
> On Monday 15 June 2009 02:55:09 Dominic Fandrey wrote:
>> Sorry for the late reply, this was auto-sorted into the ports@ mails
>> and drowned there.
>>
>> Boris Samorodov wrote:
>
>>> As I understand pkg_upgrade does not preserve old libraries at
>>> /usr/local/lib/compat?
>> Th
On Monday 15 June 2009 02:55:09 Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> Sorry for the late reply, this was auto-sorted into the ports@ mails
> and drowned there.
>
> Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > As I understand pkg_upgrade does not preserve old libraries at
> > /usr/local/lib/compat?
>
> That's true. I consider th
Sorry for the late reply, this was auto-sorted into the ports@ mails
and drowned there.
Boris Samorodov wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
> Seems to me like a bug at pkg_libchk:
> -
> % eog
> /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libgnome-desktop-2.so.7" not found,
> required by "eog"
> % ldd `which eog` | g
Hi!
Seems to me like a bug at pkg_libchk:
-
% eog
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libgnome-desktop-2.so.7" not found,
required by "eog"
% ldd `which eog` | grep found
libgnome-desktop-2.so.7 => not found (0x0)
% pkg_libchk -vc eog\*
% pkg_info -xI bsdadmin
bsdadminscripts-6.1.1
