Re: pkg-1.7.0 is an order of magnitude slower than pkg-1.6.4

2016-04-12 Thread Sascha Holzleiter
On 2016-04-07 08:43, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 02:59:06PM +0200, Michael Grimm wrote: Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 02:42:06PM +0200, Michael Grimm wrote: >> 26 seconds for 74 ports within a jail and pkg-1.6.4: […] >> 309 seconds for the very sam

Re: pkg-1.7.0 is an order of magnitude slower than pkg-1.6.4

2016-04-08 Thread Michael Grimm
Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 02:59:06PM +0200, Michael Grimm wrote: >> Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>> On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 02:42:06PM +0200, Michael Grimm wrote: 26 seconds for 74 ports within a jail and pkg-1.6.4: >> […] 309 seconds for the very same 74 por

Re: pkg-1.7.0 is an order of magnitude slower than pkg-1.6.4

2016-04-06 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 02:59:06PM +0200, Michael Grimm wrote: > Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > > On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 02:42:06PM +0200, Michael Grimm wrote: > > >> 26 seconds for 74 ports within a jail and pkg-1.6.4: > […] > >> 309 seconds for the very same 74 ports within the very same jai

Re: pkg-1.7.0 is an order of magnitude slower than pkg-1.6.4

2016-04-04 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Baptiste Daroussin wrote on 04/04/2016 13:44: On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 12:47:21PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote: Baptiste Daroussin wrote on 04/02/2016 15:00: I already upgraded to 1.7.1. Is it possible to downgrade it back to 1.6.4 or are there some incompatible changes in database? (I can bu

Re: pkg-1.7.0 is an order of magnitude slower than pkg-1.6.4

2016-04-04 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 12:47:21PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > Baptiste Daroussin wrote on 04/02/2016 15:00: > > On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 02:59:06PM +0200, Michael Grimm wrote: > >> Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >>> > >>> On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 02:42:06PM +0200, Michael Grimm wrote: > >> >

Re: pkg-1.7.0 is an order of magnitude slower than pkg-1.6.4

2016-04-04 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Baptiste Daroussin wrote on 04/02/2016 15:00: On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 02:59:06PM +0200, Michael Grimm wrote: Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 02:42:06PM +0200, Michael Grimm wrote: 26 seconds for 74 ports within a jail and pkg-1.6.4: […] 309 seconds for the very same 74

Re: pkg-1.7.0 is an order of magnitude slower than pkg-1.6.4

2016-04-02 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 02:59:06PM +0200, Michael Grimm wrote: > Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > > On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 02:42:06PM +0200, Michael Grimm wrote: > > >> 26 seconds for 74 ports within a jail and pkg-1.6.4: > […] > >> 309 seconds for the very same 74 ports within the very same jai

Re: pkg-1.7.0 is an order of magnitude slower than pkg-1.6.4

2016-04-02 Thread Michael Grimm
Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 02:42:06PM +0200, Michael Grimm wrote: >> 26 seconds for 74 ports within a jail and pkg-1.6.4: […] >> 309 seconds for the very same 74 ports within the very same jail and >> pkg-1.7.0: […] >> Is this an expected slow-down? /usr/ports/UPGRADE

Re: pkg-1.7.0 is an order of magnitude slower than pkg-1.6.4

2016-04-02 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 02:42:06PM +0200, Michael Grimm wrote: > Hi — > > This is 10.3-PRERELEASE (r297387). > > I did upgrade ports-mgmt/pkg today and ever since, I do observe a significant > slow-down when it comes to reinstalling ports from my poudriere repository: > > 26 seconds for 74 port

pkg-1.7.0 is an order of magnitude slower than pkg-1.6.4

2016-04-02 Thread Michael Grimm
Hi — This is 10.3-PRERELEASE (r297387). I did upgrade ports-mgmt/pkg today and ever since, I do observe a significant slow-down when it comes to reinstalling ports from my poudriere repository: 26 seconds for 74 ports within a jail and pkg-1.6.4: