On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 10:32 -0700, David Southwell wrote:
> On Sunday 24 May 2009 08:49:10 Robert Noland wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 08:47 -0700, David Southwell wrote:
> > > Problems on portupgrade
> > >
> > > Does anyone know how to resolve this one(Please also see also note
> > > below):
>
David Southwell writes:
> On Sunday 24 May 2009 08:49:10 Robert Noland wrote:
>> On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 08:47 -0700, David Southwell wrote:
>> > Problems on portupgrade
>> >
>> > Does anyone know how to resolve this one(Please also see also note
>> > below):
>> >
>> > Thanks in advance for any help
On Sunday 24 May 2009 08:49:10 Robert Noland wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 08:47 -0700, David Southwell wrote:
> > Problems on portupgrade
> >
> > Does anyone know how to resolve this one(Please also see also note
> > below):
> >
> > Thanks in advance for any help
>
> Uninstall them... They are no
On Sun, 24 May 2009 10:49:10 -0500
Robert Noland wrote:
>On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 08:47 -0700, David Southwell wrote:
>> Problems on portupgrade
>>
>> Does anyone know how to resolve this one(Please also see also note
>> below):
>>
>> Thanks in advance for any help
>
>Uninstall them... They are no
On Sunday 24 May 2009 08:49:10 Robert Noland wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 08:47 -0700, David Southwell wrote:
> > Problems on portupgrade
> >
> > Does anyone know how to resolve this one(Please also see also note
> > below):
> >
> > Thanks in advance for any help
>
Thanks Robert however...
> Unin
On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 08:47 -0700, David Southwell wrote:
> Problems on portupgrade
>
> Does anyone know how to resolve this one(Please also see also note below):
>
> Thanks in advance for any help
Uninstall them... They are no longer supported and will be removed at
some point. You may also wa
Problems on portupgrade
Does anyone know how to resolve this one(Please also see also note below):
Thanks in advance for any help
David
# Portupgrade -a
:
:
- x11-drivers/xf86-video-via (marked as IGNORE)
:
:
:
---> Skipping 'x11/xorg' (xorg-7.4_1) because a requisite
package 'xf86-video-vi
On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 16:02 +0100, Remko Lodder wrote:
> > ** Port marked as IGNORE: x11-drivers/xf86-video-vga:
> > is marked as broken: Needs to be removed
> > ** Port marked as IGNORE: x11-drivers/xf86-video-via:
> > requires pciVideoPtr typedef
Both of these are dead unmaintain
Apparantly for the ports to function they need a "pciVideoPtr" typedef. It
does not seem to include this by default, so it's marked as IGNORE so that
it does not get build.
On Fri, March 13, 2009 3:24 pm, David Southwell wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Anyone know what is happening here..:
> Portupgrade produc
Hi
Anyone know what is happening here..:
Portupgrade produces the following:
** Port marked as IGNORE: x11-drivers/xf86-video-cyrix:
requires pciVideoPtr typedef
** Port marked as IGNORE: x11-drivers/xf86-video-imstt:
requires pciVideoPtr typedef
** Port marked as IGNORE: x11-dri
10 matches
Mail list logo