On 2020-05-15 19:36, Bryan Drewery wrote:
===> Patching for python27-2.7.18
xargs: illegal option -- e
usage: xargs [-0opt] [-E eofstr] [-I replstr [-R replacements] [-S
replsize]]
[-J replstr] [-L number] [-n number [-x]] [-P maxprocs]
[-s size] [utility [argument .
On 5/15/2020 6:21 AM, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> I am trying to use port overlays with poudriere-devel.
> I have main tree with old quaterly branch from December 2019 (default).
> The overlay contains just a bunch of ports from current tree with
> updated versions of Apache, Python etc.
I am trying to use port overlays with poudriere-devel.
I have main tree with old quaterly branch from December 2019 (default).
The overlay contains just a bunch of ports from current tree with
updated versions of Apache, Python etc. and Mk from current ports tree.
This is called mfh_overlay.
I
I recently heard about Portshaker, and thought I might give it a go to
replace the ad-hoc script I currently use to manage local port overlays.
First, are there any plans to support rsync as an update method for
source trees? It was a little strange to discover that this was not
directly possible
> Simplicity. [...] I've got ca. 70 Gentoo servers and I want my own
> portage overlay.
Thank you very much for that explanation! I was thinking in a different
direction, as the number of machines I have is quite limited, each
with very specific needs.
As long as it is only about adding new
lay
> system brings on top of that?
Simplicity. I'm not familiar with FreeBSD's way of doing overlays, quick
googling and quick testing may be not enough to say anything in that
matter, so I'll just describe how I do it in Gentoo.
I've got ca. 70 Gentoo servers and I wa
Hi,
> 3. Someone deleted port I like to use / I want my personal ports tree:
> FreeBSD: I wish :/
> Gentoo: overlays works well.
Now I'm really curios what magic device gentoo has. Once thing I
most appreciate about FreeBSD is how flexible it is in precisely
this manner.
* i
