Re: new version of postgresql port

2010-10-07 Thread Palle Girgensohn
True, if you start by installing the client, then the server, then contrib, then it work. Otherwise, the LOCALBASE stuff screws things up. --On 7 oktober 2010 17.17.38 +0400 Alexander Pyhalov wrote: Hello. Just a notice. It seems it will not work to install different postgresql versions in di

Re: new version of postgresql port

2010-10-07 Thread Alexander Pyhalov
Hello. Just a notice. It seems it will not work to install different postgresql versions in different PREFIX'es at least because of bsd.databases.mk: lines 181 - 186: if we look at postgresql version in $LOCALBASE, it will be different from one from $PREFIX. Palle Girgensohn wrote: True, it

Re: new version of postgresql port

2010-10-07 Thread Palle Girgensohn
--On 7 oktober 2010 15.06.37 +0200 Palle Girgensohn wrote: Hi, True, it is a first shot at breaking the 1:1 relationship, it is not a solution. I think that if you install all PostgreSQL:s in different PREFIXes, it will work to install them. or if you install in prefix first... or manual

Re: new version of postgresql port

2010-10-07 Thread Palle Girgensohn
Hi, True, it is a first shot at breaking the 1:1 relationship, it is not a solution. I think that if you install all PostgreSQL:s in different PREFIXes, it will work to install them. As you say, they should opimtally install in their own non-conflicting places without changing prefix. Lets

new version of postgresql port

2010-10-07 Thread Alexander Pyhalov
Hello. I've seen interesting commit message in postgresql90-server port: "Also, try to break the previous 1:1 relation between FreeBSD system and PostgreSQL versions installed. Use different PREFIX:es to install different versions on the same system." I've fetched new version of ports and tried