On Jul 28, 2010, at 11:28 AM, David Southwell wrote:
> I believe the porters handbook recomends that ports should set the
> appropriate
> python environment at build time to prevent this problem occuring.
Sure, modulo that setting USE_PYTHON isn't going to change the default Python
which gets r
28.07.2010 22:26, David Southwell пишет:
28.07.2010 22:05, David Southwell пишет:
28.07.2010 21:57, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov пишет:
28.07.2010 21:00, David Southwell пишет:
Hi
This is a python error. Is anyone sufficiently familiar with python to
take a
look at tools/glib-signals-marshall-gen.py.
> On Jul 28, 2010, at 11:13 AM, David Southwell wrote:
> > In that case should the port not call for 26?
> >
> > Here is an extract from my pkgdb from which you can see python26 is
> > installed on the system. If the port needs 26 surely should it not call
> > for it as a dependency rather than fa
> 28.07.2010 22:05, David Southwell пишет:
> >> 28.07.2010 21:57, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov пишет:
> >>> 28.07.2010 21:00, David Southwell пишет:
> Hi
>
> This is a python error. Is anyone sufficiently familiar with python to
> take a
> look at tools/glib-signals-marshall-gen.py
On Jul 28, 2010, at 11:13 AM, David Southwell wrote:
> In that case should the port not call for 26?
>
> Here is an extract from my pkgdb from which you can see python26 is installed
> on the system. If the port needs 26 surely should it not call for it as a
> dependency rather than failing bec
28.07.2010 22:05, David Southwell пишет:
28.07.2010 21:57, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov пишет:
28.07.2010 21:00, David Southwell пишет:
Hi
This is a python error. Is anyone sufficiently familiar with python to
take a
look at tools/glib-signals-marshall-gen.py.
Is all the code in that script strict enou
> On Jul 28, 2010, at 10:00 AM, David Southwell wrote:
> > This is a python error. Is anyone sufficiently familiar with python to
> > take a look at tools/glib-signals-marshall-gen.py.
> > Is all the code in that script strict enough for python 3.
>
> No, that script contains syntax that doesn't
On Jul 28, 2010, at 10:00 AM, David Southwell wrote:
> This is a python error. Is anyone sufficiently familiar with python to take
> a
> look at tools/glib-signals-marshall-gen.py.
> Is all the code in that script strict enough for python 3.
No, that script contains syntax that doesn't work wi
> 28.07.2010 21:57, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov пишет:
> > 28.07.2010 21:00, David Southwell пишет:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> This is a python error. Is anyone sufficiently familiar with python to
> >> take a
> >> look at tools/glib-signals-marshall-gen.py.
> >> Is all the code in that script strict enough for py
28.07.2010 21:57, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov пишет:
28.07.2010 21:00, David Southwell пишет:
Hi
This is a python error. Is anyone sufficiently familiar with python to
take a
look at tools/glib-signals-marshall-gen.py.
Is all the code in that script strict enough for python 3.
David
config.status: ex
28.07.2010 21:00, David Southwell пишет:
Hi
This is a python error. Is anyone sufficiently familiar with python to take a
look at tools/glib-signals-marshall-gen.py.
Is all the code in that script strict enough for python 3.
David
config.status: executing depfiles commands
config.status: exe
Hi
This is a python error. Is anyone sufficiently familiar with python to take a
look at tools/glib-signals-marshall-gen.py.
Is all the code in that script strict enough for python 3.
David
config.status: executing depfiles commands
config.status: executing libtool commands
===> Building for
12 matches
Mail list logo