Am 24.07.2009, 14:52 Uhr, schrieb Andriy Gapon :
on 21/07/2009 18:20 Dmitry Marakasov said the following:
A fix for this was recently added. Does the updated port show the
same bahavior?
Matthias, Dmitry,
thank you very much for the responses (off- and on- list)! And sorry for
the delay.
on 21/07/2009 18:20 Dmitry Marakasov said the following:
>
> A fix for this was recently added. Does the updated port show the
> same bahavior?
Matthias, Dmitry,
thank you very much for the responses (off- and on- list)! And sorry for the
delay.
Yes, the updated port works perfectly.
--
Andri
* Andriy Gapon (a...@icyb.net.ua) wrote:
>
> I think that misc/e2fsprogs-libuuid should be MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE.
> If I build the latest version of this port (tree updated yesterday) with
> default
> options (no special variables in make.conf) on a multi-CPU machine, then it
>
I think that misc/e2fsprogs-libuuid should be MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE.
If I build the latest version of this port (tree updated yesterday) with default
options (no special variables in make.conf) on a multi-CPU machine, then it
fails
with error similar to the following:
cd ./util ; gmake subst
gmake[1
