Fernando Herrero Carrón writes:
> All in all, I don't see much use for a standalone libRmath, but it cannot
> be excluded. The truth being told, I would expect newer scientific software
> coming from python+scipy+numpy rather than from R embedded in C/C++.
Given that 1) the port has been marked b
2016-10-04 4:59 GMT+02:00 Joseph Mingrone :
> After some surgery, math/R is in more manageable shape. But, the surgery
> broke two slave ports, math/libR and math/libRmath. They have each been
> marked broken since June or July and I posted to ports@ about deleting
> them, but didn't get a respo
After some surgery, math/R is in more manageable shape. But, the surgery broke
two slave ports, math/libR and math/libRmath. They have each been marked
broken since June or July and I posted to ports@ about deleting them, but
didn't get a response.
math/libRmath
I'm not sure how widely used m
