Matthias Andree wrote:
> Am 06.08.2009, 05:38 Uhr, schrieb Doug Barton :
>
>
>> I have considered changing the order of how portmaster does things from:
>>
>> build
>> backup package (unless -B)
>> deinstall
>> install
>>
>> to:
>> backup package
>> deinstall
>> build
>> install
>>
>> That is und
Am 06.08.2009, 05:38 Uhr, schrieb Doug Barton :
I have considered changing the order of how portmaster does things from:
build
backup package (unless -B)
deinstall
install
to:
backup package
deinstall
build
install
That is undoubtedly more dangerous, and would require the "automated
backout"
Scott Bennett wrote:
> Yesterday's ports updates are just *loads* of fun. :-( Until portmaster
> reached the rebuilding of perl5.10, *every* *single* *port* that got rebuilt
> ended in failure on a "make deinstall/make reinstall" recommendation, *none*
> of which actually worked when tried.
Yesterday's ports updates are just *loads* of fun. :-( Until portmaster
reached the rebuilding of perl5.10, *every* *single* *port* that got rebuilt
ended in failure on a "make deinstall/make reinstall" recommendation, *none*
of which actually worked when tried. The only thing that worked wa
