On Tue, 11 Jul 2017, Lars Engels wrote:
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 09:45:10AM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote:
On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 02:07:29AM -0400, DTD wrote:
if you use xfce. By definition it is not a problem that:
1) install a new copy of FreeBSD 10.3
2) pkg install xorg
3) pkg install
On 5-7-2017 08:07, DTD wrote:
> if you use xfce. By definition it is not a problem that:
>
> 1) install a new copy of FreeBSD 10.3
> 2) pkg install xorg
> 3) pkg install xfce
> 4) pkg install firefox
>
> installs a firefox package that does not run. The project seems to do
> a bit
> better
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 09:45:10AM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 02:07:29AM -0400, DTD wrote:
> > if you use xfce. By definition it is not a problem that:
> >
> >1) install a new copy of FreeBSD 10.3
> >2) pkg install xorg
> >3) pkg install xfce
> >4) pkg inst
On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 02:07:29AM -0400, DTD wrote:
> if you use xfce. By definition it is not a problem that:
>
>1) install a new copy of FreeBSD 10.3
>2) pkg install xorg
>3) pkg install xfce
>4) pkg install firefox
>
> installs a firefox package that does not run. The project
if you use xfce. By definition it is not a problem that:
1) install a new copy of FreeBSD 10.3
2) pkg install xorg
3) pkg install xfce
4) pkg install firefox
installs a firefox package that does not run. The project seems to do a bit
better than this on Windows, but they (I think) have t
