On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 06:07:35PM +0100, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
> I don't see anyone complaining about Eclipse 3.2.1. Am I the only one on
> who's systems it does not compile (apparently xpcom bindings).
It compiles for me with mozilla-1.7.13_1,2 and no WITH_MOZILLA set.
Is it just me or has anyo
Carl Johan Gustavsson writes:
> >> The xpcom-problem is caused by not having the latest version of
> >> mozilla iirc.
> >
> > So building with Firefox 2 will not work?
>
> That's correct.
Also doesn't work with Seamonkey.
Robert Huff
___
Carl Johan Gustavsson wrote:
> [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
>>> Carl Johan Gustavsson wrote:
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
>> I don't see anyone complaining about Eclipse 3.2.1. Am I the
>> only one
The xpcom-problem is caused by not having the latest version of
mozilla iirc.
/ Carl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
> Carl Johan Gustavsson wrote:
>> [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
I don't see anyone complaining about Eclipse 3.2.1. Am I the
only one
>> The xpcom-problem is caused by not having the latest version of
>> mozilla iirc.
>>
>> / Carl
Carl Johan Gustavsson wrote:
> [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
>>> I don't see anyone complaining about Eclipse 3.2.1. Am I the only one
> The xpcom-problem is caused by not having the latest version of
> mozilla iirc.
>
> / Carl
So building with Firefox 2 will not work?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
> I don't see anyone complaining about Eclipse 3.2.1. Am I the only one
on who's systems it does not compile (apparently xpcom bindings).
> ___
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
>
I don't see anyone complaining about Eclipse 3.2.1. Am I the only one on who's
systems it does not compile (apparently xpcom bindings).
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, sen
