I noticed this using portmaster, and re-created it using poudriere.
The salient part of the poudriere log is:
...
===
===> Building package for subversion-1.9.3_2
pkg-static: Unable to access file
/wrkdirs/usr/ports/devel/subversion/work/st
I've a note in devel/subversion that it failed to install in March this
year...
Just then (aug 6) it again fails to install [ terse kwallet-dynamic-lib
something, broken
install line in built-already install-from-stage ; the relevant ??
option is deselected ].
Maybe someone knows if some o
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193383
Tilman Keskinoz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|In Discussion |Issue Resolved
C
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193383
Lev A. Serebryakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Needs Triage|In Discussion
--- Comment #1
,
||l...@freebsd.org,
||sasamotik...@gmail.com
Summary|[panic] svn panic when I|[panic] /devel/subversion/
|update source tree or ports |kernel panic when I update
On 2014-09-04 17:10, James R. Van Artsdalen wrote:
> So how does port subversion work now? I don't get mod_dav_svn installed
> and I don't see a knob for it.
>
> There is port www/mod_dav_svn but devel/subversion doesn't seem to
> reference it, and www/mod_
So how does port subversion work now? I don't get mod_dav_svn installed
and I don't see a knob for it.
There is port www/mod_dav_svn but devel/subversion doesn't seem to
reference it, and www/mod_dav_svn just gives errors when apache24 tries
to start.(needs shared memory suppo
Hello,
From: Yasuhiro KIMURA
Subject: Segfault while checking out port tree with devel/subversion
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 21:59:15 +0900 (JST)
> I get segmentation fault while checking out port tree with
> devel/subversion.
(snip)
> Does anyone experienced this?
This problem seems to
On Sun, 8 Jun 2014, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Matthieu.
You wrote 8 2014 ?., 15:41:42:
MV> Holy...
MV> Is this Debian now? How about 14 packages to have granularity over what
MV> sub-library needed, and 23 others for each svn* command? And don't forget
headers.
MV> An aspect of port
On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 02:41:21PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Jun 2014 16:27:15 +0400 Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> > Hello, Tijl.
> > You wrote 8 июня 2014 г., 14:16:14:
> >
> > TC> I don't want to stop you from doing this, but if I were you I'd just
> > TC> wait for subpackages support.
On Sun, 8 Jun 2014 16:27:15 +0400 Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Tijl.
> You wrote 8 июня 2014 г., 14:16:14:
>
> TC> I don't want to stop you from doing this, but if I were you I'd just
> TC> wait for subpackages support. You may want to merge all those ports
> TC> back into one port then.
> I
Hello, Matthieu.
You wrote 8 июня 2014 г., 15:41:42:
MV> Holy...
MV> Is this Debian now? How about 14 packages to have granularity over what
MV> sub-library needed, and 23 others for each svn* command? And don't forget
headers.
MV> An aspect of ports I liked was it followed/respected the upstre
Hello, Tijl.
You wrote 8 июня 2014 г., 14:16:14:
TC> I don't want to stop you from doing this, but if I were you I'd just
TC> wait for subpackages support. You may want to merge all those ports
TC> back into one port then.
It is second way. But I didn't seen any estimations about subpackages
su
On Sun, 8 Jun 2014 00:16:18 +0400
Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Ports.
>
> I've learned proper way to split subversion into several ports. Question
> is: how fine-grained should I do this? I want to split it at least into:
>
> (1) devel/subversion-libs-- base
On Sun, 8 Jun 2014 00:16:18 +0400 Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Ports.
>
> I've learned proper way to split subversion into several ports. Question
> is: how fine-grained should I do this? I want to split it at least into:
>
> (1) devel/subversion-libs-- base
Hello, Ports.
I've learned proper way to split subversion into several ports. Question
is: how fine-grained should I do this? I want to split it at least into:
(1) devel/subversion-libs-- base libs, used by all other ports. Options
about SERF, BDB and
Am 03.06.2014 17:41, schrieb Warren Block:
> On Tue, 3 Jun 2014, Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I get segmentation fault while checking out port tree with
>> devel/subversion.
>>
>> Following are result of my investigation:
>>
>> 1.
On Tue, 3 Jun 2014, Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote:
Hello,
I get segmentation fault while checking out port tree with
devel/subversion.
Following are result of my investigation:
1. With http: and https: checkout always causes segfault, while with
svn: it never happens.
2. Segfault happens only when
From: Jim Riggs
Subject: Re: Segfault while checking out port tree with devel/subversion
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 08:15:50 -0500
> Yes, we are seeing the same thing, but a single cleanup doesn't always work
> for us. Sometimes we have to go through several svn up-cleanup
On 3 Jun 2014, at 07:59, Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I get segmentation fault while checking out port tree with
> devel/subversion.
>
> ...
>
> Does anyone experienced this?
Yes, we are seeing the same thing, but a single cleanup doesn't always work for
Hello,
I get segmentation fault while checking out port tree with
devel/subversion.
Following are result of my investigation:
1. With http: and https: checkout always causes segfault, while with
svn: it never happens.
2. Segfault happens only when checking out. Running 'svn cleanup&#x
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 3:11 AM, Thomas Mueller
wrote:
> Then I won't have to boot the NetBSD-current amd64 16 GB USB stick every time
> I want to update the src (stable-10 and HEAD), ports and doc trees.
Scot Hetzel responded:
> Stable-10 and HEAD has svnlite, so you won't need to install the
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 3:11 AM, Thomas Mueller
wrote:
> Then I won't have to boot the NetBSD-current amd64 16 GB USB stick every time
> I want to update the src (stable-10 and HEAD), ports and doc trees.
>
Stable-10 and HEAD has svnlite, so you won't need to install the
subversion port to update
Am 16.12.2013 12:45, schrieb Thomas Mueller:
> Earlier I failed, for a different error, to build devel/subversion on
> FreeBSD-HEAD amd64.
>
> Most relevant part of build log was:
>
> > Compressing man pages (compress-man)
> ===> Staging rc.d startup scrip
.2 postrelease.
I also built devel/subversion successfully from pkgsrc on NetBSD-current amd64.
So I looked at the options available and selected, and I was going to try again
with BDB dropped.
You typed DBD, I assume you meant BDB but mistyped.
Then I won't have to boot the NetBSD-current
Same here on 9.2-STABLE.
Looking at the logs, I saw strange libtool lines saying that the libs
mentioned by pkg-static were not installed in /usr/local/lib, and a preamble
about Berkeley DB 6 that had not been tested by Subversion developers and the
fact that subversion's Berkeley DB backend wa
I tried to build devel/subversion on FreeBSD 10 prerelease amd64
(SVN revision 259409), and installation failed due to missing files.
All dependencies built and installed successfully.
First attempt quickly failed because of dependency databases/db42:
DEPRECATED= Please migrate to databases
On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 01:46:35 +0400
Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Charles.
> You wrote 20 июня 2013 г., 0:32:13:
>
> >> Can someone help?
>
> CS> For testing, I just built subversion-1.8.0 against Apache-2.2.24
> CS> directly via:
>
> CS> ./configure --enable-mod-activation
> CS> --with-apr
Hi, Lev--
On Jun 19, 2013, at 2:46 PM, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Charles.
> You wrote 20 июня 2013 г., 0:32:13:
>>> Can someone help?
>
> CS> For testing, I just built subversion-1.8.0 against Apache-2.2.24 directly
> via:
> CS>
> CS> ./configure --enable-mod-activation --with-apr=/usr/lo
Hello, Charles.
You wrote 20 июня 2013 г., 0:32:13:
>> Can someone help?
CS> For testing, I just built subversion-1.8.0 against Apache-2.2.24 directly
via:
CS> ./configure --enable-mod-activation
CS> --with-apr=/usr/local/apache2
CS> --with-apxs=/usr/local/apache2/bin/apxs
CS> ...which produ
Hi--
On Jun 19, 2013, at 11:30 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
[ ... ]
> Although selected, devel/subversion (1.8.0) doesn't build the module
> mod_dav_svn which is crucial for the subversion subsystem.
>
> Can someone help?
For testing, I just built subversion-1.8.0 against Apache-2.
On Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:32:13 -0700
Charles Swiger wrote:
> Hi--
>
> On Jun 19, 2013, at 11:30 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
> [ ... ]
> > Although selected, devel/subversion (1.8.0) doesn't build the module
> > mod_dav_svn which is crucial for the subversion subsyste
Several systems running FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT with Apache 24 serving
development subversion repositories via WebDAV were broken by a faulty
devel/subversion port, just updated to 1.8.0 today.
Strange thing is that those fancy dialog boxes for the configuration
ALWAYS popo up no matter whether I
On 2013/04/11, at 1:54, Sergey V. Dyatko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think freebsd template is 'broken' after r314983.
> I haven't ORGANIZATION defined on /etc/make.conf
> in this case string 'Sponsored by: ' should not be displayed, right?
> but I have it:
It will be displayed but it wasn't getting re
Hi,
I think freebsd template is 'broken' after r314983.
I haven't ORGANIZATION defined on /etc/make.conf
in this case string 'Sponsored by: ' should not be displayed, right?
but I have it:
r1242 | tiger | 2013-04-11 11:19:1
Olli Hauer ha scritto:
> It will take a while until php is really apache24 ready.
>
> Work is in progress on php upstream.
>
> One of the issues is that APXS does not provide the
> MPM model which is needed for php and others to build.
Can you try the following patch, please?
Index: bsd.php.mk
ort lang/php5 (a similar error message complaining
> about AuthzSVN-tags arise when building and reinstalling
> devel/subversion):
>
>
> ===>>> Creating a backup package for old version php5-5.4.13
> Creating package for php5-5.4.13
> The following packages will
any complains about a wrong config.
Below, I provided the error message that comes at the end of the
installation of port lang/php5 (a similar error message complaining
about AuthzSVN-tags arise when building and reinstalling
devel/subversion):
===>>> Creating a backup package for old ver
In 1.7 and upgrade results in only one .svn directory located in
/usr/src/.svn.
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 07:53:15PM +0200, Mel Flynn wrote:
> On 4/12/2012 17:30, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
>
> > Console# sqlite3 .svn/wc.db "pragma integrity_check"
> > ok
>
> Does that mean /usr/src/sys/.svn is a d
On 4/12/2012 17:30, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
> Console# sqlite3 .svn/wc.db "pragma integrity_check"
> ok
Does that mean /usr/src/sys/.svn is a directory?
--
Mel
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freeb
After going through a few problem solving sessions with subversion and
the errors it prints doing a svnversion on /usr/src/sys "E200030:
sqlite: callback requested query abort" I came to the conclusion that
either svnversion is broken in its path discovery or they are implying a
new syntax on whic
Hello, O..
You wrote 2 апреля 2012 г., 16:41:57:
> Hello,
> I faced this error this morning when trying to update/upgrade port
> devel/subversion 1.7.3 to 1.7.4:
I'm aware about this problem. Fix will be committed ASAP.
--
// Black Lion AKA L
Hello,
I faced this error this morning when trying to update/upgrade port
devel/subversion 1.7.3 to 1.7.4:
clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-fpic'
clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-fpic'
subversion/libsvn_client/cat.c:164:15: error: imp
On 07/02/2011 01:18, Douglas Thrift wrote:
I just ran into this tonight and after some searching around I found:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/158550
I'm guessing it will be committed soon,
Done today.
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
On 7/1/2011 12:21 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Since yesterday I receive on any try on a commit this error message from
> my subversion server:
>
> svn: Couldn't perform atomic initialization
> svn: database schema has changed
> svn: Your commit message was left in a temporary file:
>
> Searching for
Since yesterday I receive on any try on a commit this error message from
my subversion server:
svn: Couldn't perform atomic initialization
svn: database schema has changed
svn: Your commit message was left in a temporary file:
Searching for this error (which appeared after portsupdate via
port
Garrett Cooper wrote on 2010-07-07:
Certain bits probably need to be added to detect the version
incompatibility and recommend an upgrade and/or CONFLICTS, maybe?
I don't have a precise idea, but some support in the ports infrastructure
would be needed to assist with the OpenSSL 1.0.0 incom
t;> checking for pkg-config... /usr/local/bin/pkg-config
>> configure: checking neon library
>> checking neon library version... 0.28.6
>> configure: error: cannot find Neon
>> ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly.
>> Please report the proble
eon library version... 0.28.6
> configure: error: cannot find Neon
> ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly.
> Please report the problem to l...@freebsd.org [maintainer] and attach the
> "/usr/ports/devel/subversion/work/subversion-1.6.11/config.log" including
eport the problem to l...@freebsd.org [maintainer] and attach the
"/usr/ports/devel/subversion/work/subversion-1.6.11/config.log" including the
Looking at config.log:
configure:5698: cc -o conftest -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -g -O2
-I/usr/local/include/neon -L/usr/local/lib
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 9:06 AM, andrew clarke wrote:
> Can anyone confirm that subversion fails to build with www/neon28 and
> requires www/neon29? This is not mentioned in UPDATING.
>
> Running FreeBSD 7.3-REL.
FreeBSD 7.3-RELEASE amd64, subversion-freebsd 1.6.9 installed with
neon28 0.28.6.
Fr
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 9:06 AM, andrew clarke wrote:
> Can anyone confirm that subversion fails to build with www/neon28 and
> requires www/neon29? This is not mentioned in UPDATING.
I'm using neon28 and subversion without issues here, but I'm running CURRENT.
Thanks,
-Garrett
__
Can anyone confirm that subversion fails to build with www/neon28 and
requires www/neon29? This is not mentioned in UPDATING.
Running FreeBSD 7.3-REL.
Thanks,
Regards
Andrew
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/l
--
1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C
Philip M. Gollucci (pgollu...@p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354
Consultant - P6M7G8 Inc.http://p6m7g8.net
Senior Sys Admin- RideChar
--
1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C
Philip M. Gollucci (pgollu...@p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354
Consultant - P6M7G8 Inc.http://p6m7g8.net
Senior Sys Admin- RideChar
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Doug Poland wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 28, 2009 09:20, Glen Barber wrote:
>> Hi, Doug
>>
>> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Doug Poland
>> wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I have a question about this port. If one wants a client only
>>> install, and one wants to use htt
On Thu, May 28, 2009 09:20, Glen Barber wrote:
> Hi, Doug
>
> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Doug Poland
> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have a question about this port. If one wants a client only
>> install, and one wants to use https as the communication protocol,
>> does one choose the "static"
Hi, Doug
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Doug Poland wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a question about this port. If one wants a client only
> install, and one wants to use https as the communication protocol,
> does one choose the "static" config option?
>
> In my case I choose:
>
> WITHOUT_MOD_DAV
Hello,
I have a question about this port. If one wants a client only
install, and one wants to use https as the communication protocol,
does one choose the "static" config option?
In my case I choose:
WITHOUT_MOD_DAV_SVN=true
WITH_APACHE2_APR=true
WITHOUT_MOD_DONTDOTHAT=true
WITH_NEON=true
WITH
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 08:54:14 -0700
"Cory R. King" wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Anybody working on upgrading devel/subversion to 1.6.0? If not, I might
> take a stab at it. Since it touches so many things, like say the entire
> repository, I'd be nervous doing it--I
Howdy,
Anybody working on upgrading devel/subversion to 1.6.0? If not, I might
take a stab at it. Since it touches so many things, like say the entire
repository, I'd be nervous doing it--I'd probably break things (neon?
libapr? All the bindings?)
Thoughts?
--
Cory R. King
Mozi M
I was confused. Sorry!
on 24/11/2008 18:24 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> I am using subversion-freebsd port as a replacement for "normal" subversion.
>
> Recently I tried to install kdesdk port and was quite surprised to see
> that it wants to pull in devel/subversio
I am using subversion-freebsd port as a replacement for "normal" subversion.
Recently I tried to install kdesdk port and was quite surprised to see
that it wants to pull in devel/subversion.
It turns out that kdesdk checks for svn_client-1.0 in its LIB_DEPENDS,
but subversion-freebs
I beat you to it :)
Steve Kargl wrote:
Yes, it's a diff of a diff.
--- patch-apr_hints.m4.orig 2008-08-22 13:31:11.0 -0700
+++ patch-apr_hints.m4 2008-08-22 13:31:30.0 -0700
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
apr-1.3.2/build/apr_hints.m4.orig Wed Oct 27 11:12:28 2004
-+++ apr-1.3.2/buil
Yes, it's a diff of a diff.
--- patch-apr_hints.m4.orig 2008-08-22 13:31:11.0 -0700
+++ patch-apr_hints.m4 2008-08-22 13:31:30.0 -0700
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
apr-1.3.2/build/apr_hints.m4.orig Wed Oct 27 11:12:28 2004
-+++ apr-1.3.2/build/apr_hints.m4 Wed Oct 27 11:25:32 2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Olivier Mueller wrote:
| Hi,
|
| On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 17:07 +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
| thanks for the upgrade to subversion 1.5! Would it be possible to
add back the WITH_JAVA and WITH_PYTHON knobs ?
| [...]
|>I've added notes to UPDATIN
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 17:07 +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> >>> thanks for the upgrade to subversion 1.5! Would it be possible to add
> >>> back the WITH_JAVA and WITH_PYTHON knobs ?
[...]
>I've added notes to UPDATING a day ago :)
I currently have an old:
subversion-python-1.4.6_1
ch are
TRUE ports now and should be installed AFTER devel/subversion[-freebsd]
(no conflicts!)
Beautiful! Thanks!
Cheers,
Mezz
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD GNOME Team
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
f
Norberto Meijome wrote:
thanks for the upgrade to subversion 1.5! Would it be possible to add back the WITH_JAVA and WITH_PYTHON knobs ?
look at devel/py-subversion and java/subversion-java ports, which are
TRUE ports now and should be installed AFTER devel/subversion[-freebsd]
(no
are
> TRUE ports now and should be installed AFTER devel/subversion[-freebsd]
> (no conflicts!)
WONDERFUL! thanks so much, i hadn't noticed this. Would it make sense to add a
comment to devel/subversion referring to the new port?
( i dont think they can be installed as options, as they
Norberto Meijome wrote:
thanks for the upgrade to subversion 1.5! Would it be possible to add back the WITH_JAVA and WITH_PYTHON knobs ?
look at devel/py-subversion and java/subversion-java ports, which are
TRUE ports now and should be installed AFTER devel/subversion[-freebsd]
(no
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 06:55:19PM +1000, Norberto Meijome wrote:
> Hi guys,
> thanks for the upgrade to subversion 1.5! Would it be possible to add
> back the WITH_JAVA and WITH_PYTHON knobs ?
As far as I can see, they are available as separate ports now -
devel/py-subversion and java/subversion
Hi guys,
thanks for the upgrade to subversion 1.5! Would it be possible to add back the
WITH_JAVA and WITH_PYTHON knobs ?
thanks,
B
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
"A tyrant...is always stirring up some war or other, in order that the people
may require a leader."
P
incompatibility issues).
>
> Subversion 1.5 will support it.
That means that devel/subversion-devel and devel/subversion-freebsd
can move to www/neon28.
Edwin
--
Edwin Groothuis |Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
(Seen on [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 11:25:06AM -0400, Coleman Kane wrote:
> > Since www/neon28 was moved into ports, subversion still depends upon
> > www/neon26 (which conflicts w/ 2.8). I have been able to tell subversion
> > to use neon 2.8 by modifying the subversion Makefile
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 11:25:06AM -0400, Coleman Kane wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Since www/neon28 was moved into ports, subversion still depends upon
> www/neon26 (which conflicts w/ 2.8). I have been able to tell subversion
> to use neon 2.8 by modifying the subversion Makefile appropriately. Is
> ther
Hello,
Since www/neon28 was moved into ports, subversion still depends upon
www/neon26 (which conflicts w/ 2.8). I have been able to tell subversion
to use neon 2.8 by modifying the subversion Makefile appropriately. Is
there any specific reason to not move subversion to default to use
www/neon28
Hi,
I have some problem with the compilation of devel/subversion port: the
compilation fails with the following message:
...
cd subversion/libsvn_ra_dav && /usr/local/bin/libtool --tag=CC --silent
--mode=link cc -
Hello, Ade.
You wrote 5 февраля 2008 г., 1:59:48:
> However (there's always a however :) - would it be possible to further
> extend this to subversion-client and subversion-server (the latter
> having all the web stuff, and the former just having the basic clients).
There is one problem: they
On Feb 03, 2008, at 01:10 , Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, freebsd-ports.
I've revamped `devel/subversion*' ports (and add
`devel/subversion-java') to support building all four bindings (Perl,
python, ruby, javahl) with installed libraries. So, all binding ports
really bui
Hi Lev,
On Feb 3, 2008 5:10 PM, Lev Serebryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, freebsd-ports.
>
> I've revamped `devel/subversion*' ports (and add
> `devel/subversion-java') to support building all four bindings (Perl,
> python, ruby, javahl) with instal
Hello, freebsd-ports.
I've revamped `devel/subversion*' ports (and add
`devel/subversion-java') to support building all four bindings (Perl,
python, ruby, javahl) with installed libraries. So, all binding ports
really build bindings and depends on `devel/subversion'.
T
Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello bug-followup,
>
> Did you have `/usr/local' as symlink? Or something other non-standard in
> your tree?
> I can not reproduce this one, and I don't like `magic fix' without
> understanding of problem...
>
No, I don't have any such thing. The problem is that t
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
> Lev Serebryakov wrote:
>> Hello bug-followup,
>>
>> Did you have `/usr/local' as symlink? Or something other non-standard in
>> your tree?
>> I can not reproduce this one, and I don't like `magic fix' without
>> understanding of problem...
>>
>
> No, I don't have any s
David Southwell wrote:
> On Thursday 14 June 2007 09:59:44 [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
>> The installation of devel/subversion seems to be broken. Does anyone else
>> have this problem?
>>
>> My blind guess is that it's because I have set
>> WRKDIRP
On Thursday 14 June 2007 09:59:44 [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
> The installation of devel/subversion seems to be broken. Does anyone else
> have this problem?
>
> My blind guess is that it's because I have set
> WRKDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj/${HOST} in my make.conf.
>
> ===> Inst
The installation of devel/subversion seems to be broken. Does anyone else have
this problem?
My blind guess is that it's because I have set WRKDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj/${HOST} in
my make.conf.
===> Installing for subversion-1.4.3_2
===> subversion-1.4.3_2 depends on shared library: expa
works fine here.
subversion version: 1.4.2
$ sysctl kern.osreldate
kern.osreldate: 700027
--- Erwin Lansing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Synopsis: devel/subversion: build/linking problem on
> 7-current
>
> State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
> State-Changed-By: er
88 matches
Mail list logo
