Re: copyright status of bsdnss.c

2011-01-05 Thread Arthur de Jong
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 09:48 -0800, Jacques Vidrine wrote: > The file was originally published under the BSD license that covers > the entire ports collection ( made explicit later by > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/COPYRIGHT?rev=1.1 ). Thanks for the clarification. Having only one li

Re: copyright status of bsdnss.c

2011-01-01 Thread Kazakov Artem
Hi Arthur, yes I agree to add that header. Glad if it helps someone. Happy new year :) Artem Kazakov On 01.01.2011, at 20:42, Arthur de Jong wrote: > On Sat, 2011-01-01 at 10:44 +0300, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote: >> You should ask nek...@freebsd.org (or use finger nec...@freebsd.org for >

Re: copyright status of bsdnss.c

2011-01-01 Thread Arthur de Jong
On Sat, 2011-01-01 at 10:44 +0300, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote: > You should ask nek...@freebsd.org (or use finger nec...@freebsd.org for > other contacts) for the copyright status because I've just copied this > file (with small modifications afair) from net/nss_ldap port. See > original commit:

Re: copyright status of bsdnss.c

2010-12-31 Thread Alexander V. Chernikov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Arthur de Jong wrote: > Hi Alexander, Hello! You should ask nek...@freebsd.org (or use finger nec...@freebsd.org for other contacts) for the copyright status because I've just copied this file (with small modifications afair) from net/nss_ldap port. S

copyright status of bsdnss.c

2010-12-30 Thread Arthur de Jong
Hi Alexander, Recently, Solaris support for nss-pam-ldapd was contributed by Ted C. Cheng of Symas Corporation. The general work that was done for this also makes it possible to integrate the FreeBSD support natively into nss-pam-ldapd. For this, I would like to use the file bsdnss.c that is part