Re: clamav problem

2016-03-21 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 14:30:25 -0700, Kevin Oberman stated: > > >Hmm. Let's see. A bug that may allow the defeat of a security > >mechanism and allow a black-hat to do bad stuff before the bug con > >even be looked at. Why would anyone have an issue with that? I mean, > >don't we all want mor

Re: clamav problem

2016-03-21 Thread Carmel
On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 14:30:25 -0700, Kevin Oberman stated: >Hmm. Let's see. A bug that may allow the defeat of a security >mechanism and allow a black-hat to do bad stuff before the bug con >even be looked at. Why would anyone have an issue with that? I mean, >don't we all want more zero-day vulner

Re: clamav problem

2016-03-21 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Carmel wrote: > On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 16:42:54 +0100, Kurt Jaeger stated: > > >Hi! > > > >> >The make check of clamav exposes some issues, I've reported them > >> >upstream: > >> > > >> >https://bugzilla.clamav.net/show_bug.cgi?id=11542 > >> > >> For whatever reason

Re: clamav problem

2016-03-21 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > >> >https://bugzilla.clamav.net/show_bug.cgi?id=11542 > >> > >> For whatever reason, I keep getting this error message when I try an > >> access that report: > >> > >> You are not authorized to access bug #11542. > >Yes. It seems clamav bugzilla is restrictive and I can not change >

Re: clamav problem

2016-03-20 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > >Yes. It seems clamav bugzilla is restrictive and I can not change > >that, as submitter of that bug. > > Now that makes about "ZERO" sense. Why would you (meaning clamav) want > to hide bug information? Dumbest thing I ever saw (almost). There are several instances of ticket systems, wher

Re: clamav problem

2016-03-20 Thread Carmel
On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 16:42:54 +0100, Kurt Jaeger stated: >Hi! > >> >The make check of clamav exposes some issues, I've reported them >> >upstream: >> > >> >https://bugzilla.clamav.net/show_bug.cgi?id=11542 >> >> For whatever reason, I keep getting this error message when I try an >> access that

Re: clamav problem

2016-03-20 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > >The make check of clamav exposes some issues, I've reported them > >upstream: > > > >https://bugzilla.clamav.net/show_bug.cgi?id=11542 > > For whatever reason, I keep getting this error message when I try an > access that report: > > You are not authorized to access bug #11542. Yes. It

Re: clamav problem

2016-03-20 Thread Carmel
On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 12:44:02 +0100, Kurt Jaeger stated: >The make check of clamav exposes some issues, I've reported them >upstream: > >https://bugzilla.clamav.net/show_bug.cgi?id=11542 For whatever reason, I keep getting this error message when I try an access that report: You are not authorize

Re: clamav problem

2016-03-20 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > >Do you have LLVM Enable JIT Bytecode compiler (bundled LLVM) enabled > >when you do build clamav ? If so try building without that. > >If I try to build with that enabled on amd64 current, the tests fail, > >without that enabled everything works fine > > Okay, disabling that option and reb

Re: clamav problem

2016-03-20 Thread Carmel
On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 16:07:25 -0700, Manfred Antar stated: >Do you have LLVM Enable JIT Bytecode compiler (bundled LLVM) enabled >when you do build clamav ? If so try building without that. >If I try to build with that enabled on amd64 current, the tests fail, >without that enabled everything works

Re: clamav problem

2016-03-19 Thread Manfred Antar
> On Mar 19, 2016, at 3:46 PM, Carmel wrote: > > On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 22:05:41 +0100, Dimitry Andric stated: > >> Probably, though the rest of the internet is reachable just fine. But >> that doesn't help me understand what the bug is. Can you please >> explain? > > It appears to be a problem

Re: clamav problem

2016-03-19 Thread Carmel
On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 22:05:41 +0100, Dimitry Andric stated: >Probably, though the rest of the internet is reachable just fine. But >that doesn't help me understand what the bug is. Can you please >explain? It appears to be a problem with versions of LLVM greater than "3.6.2". Freshclam crashes wi

Re: clamav problem

2016-03-19 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 19 Mar 2016, at 18:54, Carmel wrote: > > On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 17:18:17 +0100, Dimitry Andric stated: >> On 18 Mar 2016, at 20:09, Carmel wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 13:32:01 -0400, Michael Butler stated: On 03/18/16 13:17, Carmel wrote: > I have been bitten by this bug: >

Re: clamav problem

2016-03-19 Thread Carmel
On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 17:18:17 +0100, Dimitry Andric stated: >On 18 Mar 2016, at 20:09, Carmel wrote: >> >> On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 13:32:01 -0400, Michael Butler stated: >>> On 03/18/16 13:17, Carmel wrote: I have been bitten by this bug: https://bugzilla.clamav.net/show_bug.cgi?id=1130

Re: clamav problem

2016-03-19 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 18 Mar 2016, at 20:09, Carmel wrote: > > On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 13:32:01 -0400, Michael Butler stated: >> On 03/18/16 13:17, Carmel wrote: >>> I have been bitten by this bug: >>> https://bugzilla.clamav.net/show_bug.cgi?id=11309 >>> >>> Is there anyway to correct it on a FreeBSD machine? I saw a

Re: clamav problem

2016-03-19 Thread Carmel
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 13:32:01 -0400, Michael Butler stated: >On 03/18/16 13:17, Carmel wrote: >> I have been bitten by this bug: >> https://bugzilla.clamav.net/show_bug.cgi?id=11309 >> >> Is there anyway to correct it on a FreeBSD machine? I saw a few >> suggestions, but they were not for this OS.

clamav problem

2016-03-18 Thread Carmel
I have been bitten by this bug: https://bugzilla.clamav.net/show_bug.cgi?id=11309 Is there anyway to correct it on a FreeBSD machine? I saw a few suggestions, but they were not for this OS. -- Carmel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://l

Re: clamav problem

2016-03-18 Thread Michael Butler
On 03/18/16 13:17, Carmel wrote: > I have been bitten by this bug: > https://bugzilla.clamav.net/show_bug.cgi?id=11309 > > Is there anyway to correct it on a FreeBSD machine? I saw a few > suggestions, but they were not for this OS. > Oddly enough, recompiling with gcc-4.8 works :-( Mic