Re: bsd 6 index file

2010-12-21 Thread Erwin Lansing
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 08:17:27PM +, Paul Macdonald wrote: > On 21/12/2010 19:29, Chuck Swiger wrote: > > On Dec 21, 2010, at 10:53 AM, Paul Macdonald wrote: > >> I have a couple of older boxes on freebsd 6 that are reporting ports > >> succeeding index, even after a fresh index has been down

Re: bsd 6 index file

2010-12-21 Thread Paul Macdonald
On 21/12/2010 19:29, Chuck Swiger wrote: On Dec 21, 2010, at 10:53 AM, Paul Macdonald wrote: I have a couple of older boxes on freebsd 6 that are reporting ports succeeding index, even after a fresh index has been downloaded. e.g portupgrade-2.4.8_1,2>succeeds index (index has 2.4.8,2) spam

Re: bsd 6 index file

2010-12-21 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Dec 21, 2010, at 10:53 AM, Paul Macdonald wrote: > I have a couple of older boxes on freebsd 6 that are reporting ports > succeeding index, even after a fresh index has been downloaded. > e.g > portupgrade-2.4.8_1,2 > succeeds index (index has 2.4.8,2) > spamass-milter-0.3.1_11 > succeeds i

bsd 6 index file

2010-12-21 Thread Paul Macdonald
I have a couple of older boxes on freebsd 6 that are reporting ports succeeding index, even after a fresh index has been downloaded. e.g portupgrade-2.4.8_1,2 > succeeds index (index has 2.4.8,2) spamass-milter-0.3.1_11 > succeeds index (index has 0.3.1_10) i had figured something screwy w