On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 06:11:51PM +0200, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
> ## Baptiste Daroussin (b...@freebsd.org):
>
> > You might have an old version of the ports tree, I did this commit in:
> > r318882 and reverted it in r318911 because of this mistake, than I now have
> > committed the right
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 06:07:22PM +0200, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
> ## Baptiste Daroussin (b...@freebsd.org):
>
> > You might have an old version of the ports tree, I did this commit in:
> > r318882 and reverted it in r318911 because of this mistake, than I now have
> > committed the right
## Baptiste Daroussin (b...@freebsd.org):
> You might have an old version of the ports tree, I did this commit in:
> r318882 and reverted it in r318911 because of this mistake, than I now have
> committed the right one has r319866
Digging deeper: r318882 does work for me, as that revision hat the
## Baptiste Daroussin (b...@freebsd.org):
> You might have an old version of the ports tree, I did this commit in:
> r318882 and reverted it in r318911 because of this mistake, than I now have
> committed the right one has r319866
>
> Can you confirm that upgrading the ports tree works for you?
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 05:56:36PM +0200, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> autoconf/automake-configure using ports fail to build on amd64 (not on
> i386), as witnessed with the current pcre-8.33 port (and more, if you test
> for it).
> "make configure" (ultimatively, ./configure) bails ou
Hi,
autoconf/automake-configure using ports fail to build on amd64 (not on
i386), as witnessed with the current pcre-8.33 port (and more, if you test
for it).
"make configure" (ultimatively, ./configure) bails out with
checking build system type... Invalid configuration `amd64-portbld-freebsd9.1'
