On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 05:39:03PM -0500, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> so, I am a ports committer, how about I hack bsd.port.*.mk files :-)
Commits to bsd.port.mk need to be approved by portmgr, preferably after
regression-testing on the cluster.
mcl
___
On 2012-01-09 23:39, Michael Scheidell wrote:
>
>
> On 1/9/12 5:36 PM, Olli Hauer wrote:
>> Don't worry, I believe you will do the right thing ;)
>> ( Chris just confirmed that tar can extract zip files also on 7.4 and he use
>> this in games/ioquake3)
>>
> so, that means we can use tar in 8.x a
On 1/9/12 5:36 PM, Olli Hauer wrote:
Don't worry, I believe you will do the right thing ;)
( Chris just confirmed that tar can extract zip files also on 7.4 and he use
this in games/ioquake3)
so, that means we can use tar in 8.x and 9.x. we didn't need unzip... :0-)
so, I am a ports commit
On 2012-01-09 23:18, Michael Scheidell wrote:
>
>
> On 1/9/12 4:46 PM, olli hauer wrote:
>> Have at the moment no 7.x machine handy but zip files can be handled by tar,
>> at last here on a 8.2 machine and I have no unzip installed.
>
> hey, don't confuse me.
>
Don't worry, I believe you will d
On 9 Jan 2012 21:16, "Michael Scheidell" wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/9/12 4:10 PM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
>>
>>
>> .if exists(/usr/bin/unzip)
>> UNZIP_CMD?=/usr/bin/unzip
>> .else
>> UNZIP_CMD?=${LOCALBASE}/bin/unzip
>> .endif
>>
>> in bsd.commands.mk
>>
> not in 900044
>
> grep /usr/b
On 1/9/12 4:46 PM, olli hauer wrote:
Have at the moment no 7.x machine handy but zip files can be handled by tar, at
last here on a 8.2 machine and I have no unzip installed.
hey, don't confuse me.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
>*| *SECNAP Network Security Corpor
On 2012-01-09 22:23, Greg Larkin wrote:
> On 1/9/12 4:14 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
>
>
>> On 1/9/12 4:10 PM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
>>>
>>> .if exists(/usr/bin/unzip)
>>> UNZIP_CMD?=/usr/bin/unzip
>>> .else
>>> UNZIP_CMD?=${LOCALBASE}/bin/unzip
>>> .endif
>>>
>>> in bsd.com
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 01:06:04AM +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> Michael Scheidell wrote on 10.01.2012 00:30:
>> I think I saw something in the list that FreeBSD 9.x has zip already
>> built in? so, ports that need 'zip' won't need zip?
>>
>> for maintainers, they should use something like:
>
On 1/9/12 4:23 PM, Greg Larkin wrote:
This list of version values is very helpful in these cases:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/freebsd-versions.html
Unfortunately, the version was not bumped when unzip was added to base,
but you'll probably be able to narrow down where
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 1/9/12 4:14 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
>
>
> On 1/9/12 4:10 PM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
>>
>> .if exists(/usr/bin/unzip)
>> UNZIP_CMD?=/usr/bin/unzip
>> .else
>> UNZIP_CMD?=${LOCALBASE}/bin/unzip
>> .endif
>>
>> in bsd.command
On 1/9/12 4:10 PM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
.if exists(/usr/bin/unzip)
UNZIP_CMD?=/usr/bin/unzip
.else
UNZIP_CMD?=${LOCALBASE}/bin/unzip
.endif
in bsd.commands.mk
not in 900044
grep /usr/bin/zip /usr/ports/Mk/*
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
On 1/9/12 4:06 PM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
(at what OSVERSION was zip included in the base?)
unzip, not zip. I believe it should be handled in bsd.port.mk like it
done for USE_XZ. Something like:
.if defined(USE_ZIP) && ${OSVERSION} < 90
EXTRACT_DEPENDS+=
${LOCALBASE}/bin/
Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote on 10.01.2012 01:06:
Michael Scheidell wrote on 10.01.2012 00:30:
I think I saw something in the list that FreeBSD 9.x has zip already
built in? so, ports that need 'zip' won't need zip?
for maintainers, they should use something like:
USE_ZIP= yes
to:
if ${OSVERSIO
Michael Scheidell wrote on 10.01.2012 00:30:
I think I saw something in the list that FreeBSD 9.x has zip already
built in? so, ports that need 'zip' won't need zip?
for maintainers, they should use something like:
USE_ZIP= yes
to:
if ${OSVERSION} <= 90
USE_ZIP= yes
.endif
and/or BUILD_D
I think I saw something in the list that FreeBSD 9.x has zip already
built in? so, ports that need 'zip' won't need zip?
for maintainers, they should use something like:
USE_ZIP=yes
to:
if ${OSVERSION} <= 90
USE_ZIP=yes
.endif
and/or BUILD_DEPENDS+=zip:${PORTSDIR}/archive
I think I saw something in the list that FreeBSD 9.x has zip already
built in? so, ports that need 'zip' won't need zip?
for maintainers, they should use something like:
USE_ZIP=yes
to:
if ${OSVERSION} <= 90
USE_ZIP=yes
.endif
and/or BUILD_DEPENDS+=zip:${PORTSDIR}/archive
16 matches
Mail list logo
