Re: amule 2.2.3 port - first try

2009-01-09 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
Hello, After fixing the plist, a few more errors disappeared. But I still get some errors when doing 'port test': ===> Extra files and directories check man/de/man1/amulecmd.1 man/de/man1/amuleweb.1 man/de/man1/amule.1 man/de/man1/ed2k.1 man/de/man1/xas.1 man/de/man1/cas.1 man/de/man1/wxcas.1 man

Re: amule 2.2.3 port - first try

2009-01-06 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
Hello, I am still testing and fixing my aMule 2.2.3 port. I am using 'port test' from porttools (a very nice tool), and in the "make package" step I notice something funny: ===> Building package for aMule-2.2.3 Creating package /usr/ports/net-p2p/amule2.work/aMule-2.2.3.tbz Registering depends:.

Re: amule 2.2.3 port - first try

2009-01-05 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 9:49 PM, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > But then the ports system thinks that the files are installed in > $DOCSDIR/docs, and puts that in PLIST. Not good. > > I would prefer to keep DOCSDIR like it is. > Is it a way to get the files into PORTDOCS so that they get recorded > cor

Re: amule 2.2.3 port - first try

2009-01-04 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
A small update: I have fixed the man pages problem. Since the fr man pages are incomplete, I have to gzip them manually in the post-install target (this is actually the way it was done in the previous version of the port. The rest was simply adding all the language man pages to Makefile.man. New Ma

Re: amule 2.2.3 port - first try

2008-12-30 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 8:24 PM, Dmitry Marakasov wrote: > * Torfinn Ingolfsen (tin...@gmail.com) wrote: > > It builds OK, but plist (and Makefile.man I guess) is incorrect. I knew about plist - I haven't done too much updating of that. I need to figure out a manageable way of maintaining it. Som

Re: amule 2.2.3 port - first try

2008-12-30 Thread Dmitry Marakasov
* Torfinn Ingolfsen (tin...@gmail.com) wrote: It builds OK, but plist (and Makefile.man I guess) is incorrect. http://people.freebsd.org/~amdmi3/aMule-nooptimize-2.2.3.log don't mind -nooptimize, I'm just testing it with different options. -- Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 95

Re: amule 2.2.3 port - first try

2008-12-30 Thread Dmitry Marakasov
* Torfinn Ingolfsen (tin...@gmail.com) wrote: > > This patch looks good at a first glance, I've scheduled it to be build > > in a tinderbox. > > Which reminds me I have to fix my own tinderbox, after the last update > it doesn't run anymore. Probably just ome config files that mut be > changed. >

Re: amule 2.2.3 port - first try

2008-12-30 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 7:33 PM, Dmitry Marakasov wrote: > Something tells me that he meant to answer your previous message > about a patch that removes a file. I thought you're trying to make a > patch-* for ports's files/ too, before I understood that you're trying to > make a patch to a port it

Re: amule 2.2.3 port - first try

2008-12-30 Thread Bernhard Fröhlich
On Tue, December 30, 2008 7:04 pm, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Bernhard Froehlich > wrote: >> Looks like you are in the wrong folder. Patches are relative to the >> WRKSRC >> directory. (work/aMule-2.2.3 or something like that) So recreate the >> patch f

Re: amule 2.2.3 port - first try

2008-12-30 Thread Dmitry Marakasov
* Torfinn Ingolfsen (tin...@gmail.com) wrote: Something tells me that he meant to answer your previous message about a patch that removes a file. I thought you're trying to make a patch-* for ports's files/ too, before I understood that you're trying to make a patch to a port itself. This patch l

Re: amule 2.2.3 port - first try

2008-12-30 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
Hello, On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Bernhard Froehlich wrote: > Looks like you are in the wrong folder. Patches are relative to the WRKSRC > directory. (work/aMule-2.2.3 or something like that) So recreate the patch > from > within that directory and it should work. I'm not really sure wha

Re: amule 2.2.3 port - first try

2008-12-30 Thread Bernhard Froehlich
Torfinn Ingolfsen gmail.com> writes: > > Hello, > I am updating the amule2 port to version 2.2.3, this is the first try. > The patch is attached. > There is (at least) one problem with the patch: it doesn't remove the > file ./files/patch-amuleDlg.cpp. For now, just remove the file > manually. >

Re: amule 2.2.3 port - first try

2008-12-29 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
Small update. On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 12:39 AM, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > Testing: I have tested this patch on FreeBSD 7.1-prerelease / amd64, > and the amule 2.2.3 port compiles and installs fine. FWIW, It also compiled, installed and is currently running on FreeBSD 6.4-stable / amd64. -- Reg

amule 2.2.3 port - first try

2008-12-29 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
Hello, I am updating the amule2 port to version 2.2.3, this is the first try. The patch is attached. There is (at least) one problem with the patch: it doesn't remove the file ./files/patch-amuleDlg.cpp. For now, just remove the file manually. Doesn't FreeBSDs diff have an option to remove files? I