On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 10:45:46AM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
> 2009/4/17 Oleg Ginzburg :
> > And i forget to say for one else problem with {archivers,mis}/deco:
> > both of them produced one binary file in /usr/local/bin/deco.
> >
> > cd /usr/ports/archivers/deco
> > make install
> > ...
> > (i have
2009/4/17 Oleg Ginzburg :
> And i forget to say for one else problem with {archivers,mis}/deco:
> both of them produced one binary file in /usr/local/bin/deco.
>
> cd /usr/ports/archivers/deco
> make install
> ...
> (i have deco archivers)
> pkg_add -r deco
>
> (deco/NC-clone replace /usr/local/bin
And i forget to say for one else problem with {archivers,mis}/deco:
both of them produced one binary file in /usr/local/bin/deco.
cd /usr/ports/archivers/deco
make install
...
(i have deco archivers)
pkg_add -r deco
(deco/NC-clone replace /usr/local/bin/deco)
pkg_which /usr/local/bin/deco
[Upda
On Thursday 16 April 2009 19:52:38 Chris Rees wrote:
> 2009/4/16 Oleg Ginzburg :
> > Hello maillist!
> >
> > I have two examples of ports with which arises some complexities by
> > operation with pkg_add and argument "-r".
> >
> > One of ports is "security/keepassx". His name is registered in lower
Hello maillist!
I have two examples of ports with which arises some complexities by operation
with pkg_add and argument "-r".
One of ports is "security/keepassx". His name is registered in lowercase,
however at installation in/var/db/pkg is registered as KeepAssX. If to try to
install port wi
