On 6 January 2013 12:13, Simon L. B. Nielsen wrote:
> On 5 January 2013 11:14, Chris Rees wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The submitter of ports/174427 tells me that using http for mirrors is
>> faster, due to the lack of authentication etc.
>>
>> I'm not convinced that the speed difference is huge, but
On 5 January 2013 11:14, Chris Rees wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The submitter of ports/174427 tells me that using http for mirrors is
> faster, due to the lack of authentication etc.
>
> I'm not convinced that the speed difference is huge, but can anyone
> think of any reasons not to apply this patch? I
Hi all,
The submitter of ports/174427 tells me that using http for mirrors is
faster, due to the lack of authentication etc.
I'm not convinced that the speed difference is huge, but can anyone
think of any reasons not to apply this patch? It will affect large
numbers of ports.
Chris
http://www