Re: Update of ImageMagick to 6.6.7.10, dependencies

2011-03-11 Thread Warren Block
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Helmut Schneider wrote: Doug Barton wrote: On 03/10/2011 13:29, Warren Block wrote: On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Doug Barton wrote: On 03/10/2011 02:40, Helmut Schneider wrote: ...most of "my" users won't run Typo3 and X on the same machine. :) Sounds like it's time for imag

Re: Update of ImageMagick to 6.6.7.10, dependencies

2011-03-11 Thread Helmut Schneider
David Demelier wrote: > On 10/03/2011 00:10, Helmut Schneider wrote: > > I updated ImageMagick from 6.6.6.10 to 6.6.7.10 and a bunch of new > > ports were installed[1]. Holy...!! Are they really necessary? > > Try defining WITHOUT_GCONF=yes in your /etc/make.conf, SVG support > need librsvg which

Re: Update of ImageMagick to 6.6.7.10, dependencies

2011-03-11 Thread David Demelier
On 10/03/2011 00:10, Helmut Schneider wrote: Hi, I updated ImageMagick from 6.6.6.10 to 6.6.7.10 and a *bunch* of new ports were installed[1]. Holy...!! Are they really necessary? Thanks, Helmut [1] ORBit2-2.14.19 atk-1.32.0 compositeproto-0.4.2 cups-client-1.4.6 damageproto-1.2.1 dbus-glib-0.

Re: Update of ImageMagick to 6.6.7.10, dependencies

2011-03-11 Thread Helmut Schneider
Doug Barton wrote: > On 03/10/2011 13:29, Warren Block wrote: > > On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Doug Barton wrote: > > > On 03/10/2011 02:40, Helmut Schneider wrote: > > > > > > > > ...most of "my" users won't run Typo3 and X on the same > > > > machine. :) > > > > > > Sounds like it's time for imagemagi

Re: Update of ImageMagick to 6.6.7.10, dependencies

2011-03-10 Thread Warren Block
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Helmut Schneider wrote: Warren Block wrote: On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Doug Barton wrote: On 03/10/2011 02:40, Helmut Schneider wrote: ...most of "my" users won't run Typo3 and X on the same machine. :) Sounds like it's time for imagemagick-nox11 slave port. Would that be

Re: Update of ImageMagick to 6.6.7.10, dependencies

2011-03-10 Thread Doug Barton
On 03/10/2011 13:29, Warren Block wrote: On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Doug Barton wrote: On 03/10/2011 02:40, Helmut Schneider wrote: ...most of "my" users won't run Typo3 *and* X on the same machine. :) Sounds like it's time for imagemagick-nox11 slave port. Would that be different from turning o

Re: Update of ImageMagick to 6.6.7.10, dependencies

2011-03-10 Thread Helmut Schneider
Warren Block wrote: > On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Doug Barton wrote: > > On 03/10/2011 02:40, Helmut Schneider wrote: > > > > > > ...most of "my" users won't run Typo3 and X on the same machine. > > > :) > > > > Sounds like it's time for imagemagick-nox11 slave port. > > Would that be different from t

Re: Update of ImageMagick to 6.6.7.10, dependencies

2011-03-10 Thread Warren Block
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Warren Block wrote: On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Doug Barton wrote: On 03/10/2011 02:40, Helmut Schneider wrote: ...most of "my" users won't run Typo3 *and* X on the same machine. :) Sounds like it's time for imagemagick-nox11 slave port. Would that be different from turning

Re: Update of ImageMagick to 6.6.7.10, dependencies

2011-03-10 Thread Warren Block
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Doug Barton wrote: On 03/10/2011 02:40, Helmut Schneider wrote: ...most of "my" users won't run Typo3 *and* X on the same machine. :) Sounds like it's time for imagemagick-nox11 slave port. Would that be different from turning off the X11 config option of the ImageMagi

Re: Update of ImageMagick to 6.6.7.10, dependencies

2011-03-10 Thread Doug Barton
On 03/10/2011 02:40, Helmut Schneider wrote: Anton Shterenlikht wrote: On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 11:32:25PM +, Helmut Schneider wrote: Martin Wilke wrote: On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 7:10 AM, Helmut Schneider wrote: I updated ImageMagick from 6.6.6.10 to 6.6.7.10 and a bunch of new ports we

Re: Update of ImageMagick to 6.6.7.10, dependencies

2011-03-10 Thread Helmut Schneider
Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 11:32:25PM +, Helmut Schneider wrote: > > Martin Wilke wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 7:10 AM, Helmut Schneider > > > wrote: > > > > I updated ImageMagick from 6.6.6.10 to 6.6.7.10 and a bunch of > > > > new ports were installed[1

Re: Update of ImageMagick to 6.6.7.10, dependencies

2011-03-10 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 11:32:25PM +, Helmut Schneider wrote: > Martin Wilke wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 7:10 AM, Helmut Schneider > > wrote: > > > I updated ImageMagick from 6.6.6.10 to 6.6.7.10 and a bunch of new > > > ports were installed[1]. Holy...!! Are they really necessary? >

Re: Update of ImageMagick to 6.6.7.10, dependencies

2011-03-09 Thread Helmut Schneider
Martin Wilke wrote: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 7:10 AM, Helmut Schneider > wrote: > > I updated ImageMagick from 6.6.6.10 to 6.6.7.10 and a bunch of new > > ports were installed[1]. Holy...!! Are they really necessary? > > thats happend because svg is now enabled by default, xfce requested > that.

Re: Update of ImageMagick to 6.6.7.10, dependencies

2011-03-09 Thread Martin Wilke
thats happend because svg is now enabled by default, xfce requested that. On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 7:10 AM, Helmut Schneider wrote: > Hi, > > I updated ImageMagick from 6.6.6.10 to 6.6.7.10 and a *bunch* of new > ports were installed[1]. Holy...!! Are they really necessary? > > Thanks, Helmut > >

Update of ImageMagick to 6.6.7.10, dependencies

2011-03-09 Thread Helmut Schneider
Hi, I updated ImageMagick from 6.6.6.10 to 6.6.7.10 and a *bunch* of new ports were installed[1]. Holy...!! Are they really necessary? Thanks, Helmut [1] ORBit2-2.14.19 atk-1.32.0 compositeproto-0.4.2 cups-client-1.4.6 damageproto-1.2.1 dbus-glib-0.88 dconf-0.5.1_3 docbook-4.1_4 docbook-xsl-1.75