On 10/04/2010 23:30, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 4:26 AM, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
>> On 10/04/2010 12:49, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>>> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 3:44 AM, Dominic Fandrey
>>> wrote:
On 10/04/2010 12:18, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 2:29 AM
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 4:26 AM, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> On 10/04/2010 12:49, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 3:44 AM, Dominic Fandrey
>> wrote:
>>> On 10/04/2010 12:18, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 2:29 AM, Dominic Fandrey
wrote:
> This morning
On 10/04/2010 13:11, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 03:18:42 -0700
> Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> FWIW, I've thought this over and and user modifiable scripts should
>> not be in packages; they should instead be example files which don't
>> conflict with real configuration files. This is
On 10/04/2010 12:49, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 3:44 AM, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
>> On 10/04/2010 12:18, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>>> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 2:29 AM, Dominic Fandrey
>>> wrote:
This morning I took a look at my outstanding PRs. There are
is a ports PR I
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 03:18:42 -0700
Garrett Cooper wrote:
> FWIW, I've thought this over and and user modifiable scripts should
> not be in packages; they should instead be example files which don't
> conflict with real configuration files. This is already the case for
> several ports, but not all
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 2:29 AM, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> This morning I took a look at my outstanding PRs. There are
> is a ports PR I consider old and trivial:
>
> This one fixes a bug in the package-noinstall target. wxs told
> me that he prefers my proposed fix over his own:
> http://www.freeb
This morning I took a look at my outstanding PRs. There are
is a ports PR I consider old and trivial:
This one fixes a bug in the package-noinstall target. wxs told
me that he prefers my proposed fix over his own:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/144164
Regards
--
A: Because it
