Hi,
On 21/07/07, Nikola Lecic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If the base (your texmf-minimal) remains unchanged (as it was at the
time of TL2007 release) -- it will maybe need some patches for the files
outside xetexdir/, but nothing too difficult.
XeTeX also requires texmf-full.
So this means t
On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 21:27:52 +0100
"Edd Barrett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sounds like you are planning on making a far more "fine grained" port
> than I have. Be warned it is a massive port that will drive you insane
> if you get too involved. I have my port in only 4 modules. Read the
> PDF I
(Hmmm, claws-mail somehow removed hrs@ from CC; I'm re-adding him.)
On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 21:27:52 +0100
"Edd Barrett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Nikola,
>
> On 21/07/07, Nikola Lecic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes, I saw this on texlive mailing list, excellent job!
>
> Thankyou.
>
> >
Hi Nikola,
On 21/07/07, Nikola Lecic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, I saw this on texlive mailing list, excellent job!
Thankyou.
I'd like to ask
Hiroki Sato, you and everyone interested/involved in this (and I'm not
fluent in OpenBSD ports interface...) for their opinion regarding to
what e
Hello Edd,
On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 20:07:46 +0100
"Edd Barrett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Firstly I would like to apologise for the cross-post. I wouldn't
> usually do this, but as the message for both lists is identical, It
> would have looked like a cross post (even if it wasn't)...
O
Hi,
Firstly I would like to apologise for the cross-post. I wouldn't
usually do this, but as the message for both lists is identical, It
would have looked like a cross post (even if it wasn't)...
I have just finished porting TeXLive (A modern TeX distribution to
replace the old teTeX port) to O
