On 12/14/17 10:44, Adam Weinberger wrote:
There's no minimum number of ports required to create a category, and
precedent is simply "more than a few." Six ports (as proposed for
physics) is almost certainly too low. It might be more useful to just
make sure that the word "physics" appears in
On 14 Dec, 2017, at 9:47, Yuri wrote:
Some ports naturally fall under these categories:
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D13481
Thanks,
Yuri
I am a big fan of virtual categories. They make wading through the nearly
30,000 ports a much easier task. It's even more important for specialized
fie
On 12/14/17 10:05, RW via freebsd-ports wrote:
Science isn't particularly large:
This is for search and categorization purposes. They aren't going to be
moved, category will be added to the list of relevant categories.
Yuri
___
freebsd-ports@fre
On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 08:47:38 -0800
Yuri wrote:
> Some ports naturally fall under these categories:
>
> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D13481
Science isn't particularly large:
$ for d in `make -V SUBDIR` ;do echo "`find $d/ -maxdepth 1 -type d
|wc -l` $d" ;done |sort -n | tail -n 30
179
Some ports naturally fall under these categories:
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D13481
Thanks,
Yuri
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsu
