Re: Subscription for committer

2016-12-20 Thread John Marino
On 12/20/2016 18:39, Warren Block wrote: On Mon, 19 Dec 2016, John Marino wrote: On 12/19/2016 20:22, Mark Linimon wrote: On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 07:07:06PM -0600, John Marino wrote: It's a natural reaction to stop attempting to contribute when previous contributions don't get "attention they

Re: Subscription for committer

2016-12-20 Thread Warren Block
On Mon, 19 Dec 2016, John Marino wrote: On 12/19/2016 20:22, Mark Linimon wrote: On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 07:07:06PM -0600, John Marino wrote: It's a natural reaction to stop attempting to contribute when previous contributions don't get "attention they deserve". Which some people (including

Re: Subscription for committer

2016-12-19 Thread John Marino
On 12/19/2016 20:22, Mark Linimon wrote: On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 07:07:06PM -0600, John Marino wrote: It's a natural reaction to stop attempting to contribute when previous contributions don't get "attention they deserve". Which some people (including me) see as odds with: the impression tha

Re: Subscription for committer (was: Re: The ports collection has some serious issues)

2016-12-19 Thread Thomas Mueller
> 17.12.2016 22:40, John Marino пишет: >> I am not subscribed to the mail list > A port's committer is not subscribed to the ports@ ML? > Is it a joke? > WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam) When I see frequent posts by somebody on a mailing list, I assume that person is a regular

Re: Subscription for committer

2016-12-19 Thread Mark Linimon
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 07:07:06PM -0600, John Marino wrote: > It's a natural reaction to stop attempting to contribute when previous > contributions don't get "attention they deserve". Which some people (including me) see as odds with: > the impression that portmaster is officially recommended [

Re: Subscription for committer

2016-12-19 Thread John Marino
On 12/19/2016 18:36, Warren Block wrote: On Mon, 19 Dec 2016, John Marino wrote: On 12/19/2016 04:18, Boris Samorodov wrote: 17.12.2016 22:40, John Marino пишет: I am not subscribed to the mail list A port's committer is not subscribed to the ports@ ML? Is it a joke? I don't want to par

Re: Subscription for committer

2016-12-19 Thread Warren Block
On Mon, 19 Dec 2016, John Marino wrote: On 12/19/2016 04:18, Boris Samorodov wrote: 17.12.2016 22:40, John Marino пишет: I am not subscribed to the mail list A port's committer is not subscribed to the ports@ ML? Is it a joke? I don't want to participate in this list. The only reason I'

Re: Subscription for committer

2016-12-19 Thread John Marino
On 12/19/2016 04:18, Boris Samorodov wrote: 17.12.2016 22:40, John Marino пишет: I am not subscribed to the mail list A port's committer is not subscribed to the ports@ ML? Is it a joke? I don't want to participate in this list. The only reason I'm stuck on this topic is because Warren s

Subscription for committer (was: Re: The ports collection has some serious issues)

2016-12-19 Thread Boris Samorodov
17.12.2016 22:40, John Marino пишет: > I am not subscribed to the mail list A port's committer is not subscribed to the ports@ ML? Is it a joke? -- WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam) FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve ___ freebsd-po