On 03/07/15 23:36, Yuri wrote:
On 03/07/2015 21:28, Russell L. Carter wrote:
I would like to understand better the problem here, because I use c++11
features heavily with lang/gcc49 on a daily basis with zero problems.
No, gcc-4.9.3 fails in the same way. Specific missing feature:
std::snpr
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Yuri wrote:
>> On 03/07/2015 21:28, Russell L. Carter wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I would like to understand better the problem here, because I use c++11
>>> features heavily with lang/gcc49 on a daily basis with zero
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Yuri wrote:
> On 03/07/2015 21:28, Russell L. Carter wrote:
>>
>>
>> I would like to understand better the problem here, because I use c++11
>> features heavily with lang/gcc49 on a daily basis with zero problems.
>
>
> No, gcc-4.9.3 fails in the same way. Specific
On 03/07/2015 21:28, Russell L. Carter wrote:
I would like to understand better the problem here, because I use c++11
features heavily with lang/gcc49 on a daily basis with zero problems.
No, gcc-4.9.3 fails in the same way. Specific missing feature: std::snprintf
error: 'snprintf' is not a m
On 03/07/15 16:14, Yuri wrote:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193528
Many packages still don't build with clang (in part because Linux didn't
adopt it as much as FreeBSD did), and at the same time they are changing
code to be c++11.
As a result, many such packages can't be u
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193528
Many packages still don't build with clang (in part because Linux didn't
adopt it as much as FreeBSD did), and at the same time they are changing
code to be c++11.
As a result, many such packages can't be updated any more.
In two days I
