On Mon, 29 Mar 2010, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
As should be obvious by now I'm following through on my previously
stated plans to remove the no longer necessary %%RC_SUBR%% and
%%RC_SUBR_SUFFIX%% from the ports tree.
Does it still make sense to use
rcvar=`set_rcvar`
Doug Barton wrote:
> As should be obvious by now I'm following through on my previously
> stated plans to remove the no longer necessary %%RC_SUBR%% and
> %%RC_SUBR_SUFFIX%% from the ports tree.
Does it still make sense to use
rcvar=`set_rcvar`
as recommended by rc.subr(8) or should we just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On 03/27/10 23:41, Doug Barton wrote:
> I will do one more grep through the entire ports tree tomorrow to make
> sure I have taken care of everything, but I'm pretty sure at this point
> that we're ready for the final step, the removal of the rel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Howdy,
As should be obvious by now I'm following through on my previously
stated plans to remove the no longer necessary %%RC_SUBR%% and
%%RC_SUBR_SUFFIX%% from the ports tree. In a few cases where
substitutions for the former are still necessary
