Re: Regression in PREFIX handling in packages

2012-09-01 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 22:02:46 +0200 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > And this one is tested (copy&paste, may have lost tabs and add > linebreaks from my mailer): > ---snip--- > # svn diff > Index: perform.c > === > --- perform.c (revisi

Re: Regression in PREFIX handling in packages

2012-08-31 Thread Oliver Fromme
I think this might be related to this thread, so I'm posting it as a follow-up ... On some FreeBSD 8.x systems, I get the following error: ===> Deinstalling for security/ca_root_nss readlink: illegal option -- f usage: readlink [-n] [file ...] It seems bsd.port.mk is trying to use /usr/bin/read

Re: Regression in PREFIX handling in packages

2012-08-29 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 12:59:30 -0700 Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Alexander Leidinger > wrote: > > On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:28:36 -0400 Eitan Adler > > wrote: > > > >> On 29 August 2012 15:17, Alexander Leidinger > >> wrote: > >> > Could it be that my problem comes fro

Re: Regression in PREFIX handling in packages

2012-08-29 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 21:48:31 +0200 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:28:36 -0400 Eitan Adler > wrote: > > > On 29 August 2012 15:17, Alexander Leidinger > > wrote: > > > Could it be that my problem comes from r231300 and I was lucky > > > that I didn't create a package on the

Re: Regression in PREFIX handling in packages

2012-08-29 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:28:36 -0400 Eitan Adler > wrote: > >> On 29 August 2012 15:17, Alexander Leidinger >> wrote: >> > Could it be that my problem comes from r231300 and I was lucky that >> > I didn't create a package on the machin

Re: Regression in PREFIX handling in packages

2012-08-29 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:28:36 -0400 Eitan Adler wrote: > On 29 August 2012 15:17, Alexander Leidinger > wrote: > > Could it be that my problem comes from r231300 and I was lucky that > > I didn't create a package on the machine with the > > symlinked /usr/local and used it on a machine with a > >

Re: Regression in PREFIX handling in packages

2012-08-29 Thread Eitan Adler
On 29 August 2012 15:17, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Could it be that my problem comes from r231300 and I was lucky that I > didn't create a package on the machine with the symlinked /usr/local > and used it on a machine with a normal /usr/local? I have not been following this thread, so if you

Re: Regression in PREFIX handling in packages

2012-08-29 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 22:54:35 +0200 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Hi, > > I detected a regression in the handling of the registration of the > PREFIX in packages. I'm not sure when it was introduced, surely more > than a month ago. > > The problem: > - I have a symlink from /usr/local to another

Re: Regression in PREFIX handling in packages

2012-08-26 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 8/26/2012 3:54 PM, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Hi, > > I detected a regression in the handling of the registration of the > PREFIX in packages. I'm not sure when it was introduced, surely more > than a month ago. Are you using any tools for managing these packages? portmaster, portupgrade?

Regression in PREFIX handling in packages

2012-08-26 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Hi, I detected a regression in the handling of the registration of the PREFIX in packages. I'm not sure when it was introduced, surely more than a month ago. The problem: - I have a symlink from /usr/local to another place X. - I share packages between this system A and some jails. - The jails