Re: www/opera ISSUE Java Plugin missing

2013-04-09 Thread awarecons
Looks like in further releases Opera changed smth itself, so it started to catch icedtea-web had been build with USE_GCC=4.6 Such things happen when something is hard-coded during coding... - non-grata practice) Thank you. 2013/1/19 Claude Buisson : > Hi, > > I saw this thread on ports@ archive,

Re: www/opera ISSUE Java Plugin missing

2013-01-18 Thread Joseph A. Nagy, Jr
On 01/18/13 13:19, awarecons wrote: Are you saying the handbook instructions for enabling java in Opera do not work, then? Seems to be so in the case. You're doing something wrong, than. Opera 12.12 on my system catches java/icedtea-web I just installed Opera, launched it, and checked the plu

Re: www/opera ISSUE Java Plugin missing

2013-01-18 Thread awarecons
>Are you saying the handbook instructions for enabling java in Opera do not >work, then? Seems to be so in the case. >You're doing something wrong, than. Opera 12.12 on my system catches >java/icedtea-web I just installed Opera, launched it, and checked the plugin >list[0,1]. I've installed t

Re: www/opera ISSUE Java Plugin missing

2013-01-18 Thread Joseph A. Nagy, Jr
On 01/18/13 09:06, awarecons wrote: As it was mentioned above: since Opera 10.50 it doesn't use Java directly, hence it looks for a special Java plugin file libnpjp2.so and ONLY! The problem is that the file libnpjp2.so residues in linux-sun-jre1[67] only, not in openjdk nor diablo nor jdk16 edi

Re: www/opera ISSUE Java Plugin missing

2013-01-18 Thread awarecons
As it was mentioned above: since Opera 10.50 it doesn't use Java directly, hence it looks for a special Java plugin file libnpjp2.so and ONLY! The problem is that the file libnpjp2.so residues in linux-sun-jre1[67] only, not in openjdk nor diablo nor jdk16 editions, though available is non-native

Re: www/opera ISSUE Java Plugin missing

2013-01-18 Thread Joseph A. Nagy, Jr
On 01/18/13 05:55, Jakub Lach wrote: You are missing my point. Opera couldn't just outright stop 'supporting' Java plug-ins (more like Java content, believe it or not, but using plug-in or JRE is secondary here), but they are not ones responsible for this environment deployment. No, I don't thi

Re: www/opera ISSUE Java Plugin missing

2013-01-18 Thread Jakub Lach
You are missing my point. Opera couldn't just outright stop 'supporting' Java plug-ins (more like Java content, believe it or not, but using plug-in or JRE is secondary here), but they are not ones responsible for this environment deployment. I know FreeBSD as a project should document to the

Re: www/opera ISSUE Java Plugin missing

2013-01-17 Thread Joseph A. Nagy, Jr
On 01/17/13 18:19, Jakub Lach wrote: People actually still use browser java plug-ins/ they actually work? Life never ceases to amaze. Seriously though, I see no place for them in modern operating systems at all. Awful security record, as well as required only by obsolete and broken by design th

Re: www/opera ISSUE Java Plugin missing

2013-01-17 Thread Michael Gmelin
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 16:19:33 -0800 (PST) Jakub Lach wrote: > People actually still use browser java plug-ins/ they actually work? > > Life never ceases to amaze. > > Seriously though, I see no place for them in modern operating > systems at all. Awful security record, as well as required only >

Re: www/opera ISSUE Java Plugin missing

2013-01-17 Thread Jakub Lach
People actually still use browser java plug-ins/ they actually work? Life never ceases to amaze. Seriously though, I see no place for them in modern operating systems at all. Awful security record, as well as required only by obsolete and broken by design things. -- View this message in contex

Re: www/opera ISSUE Java Plugin missing

2013-01-17 Thread Joseph A. Nagy, Jr
On 01/17/13 13:47, awarecons wrote: > As of official http://www.opera.com/docs/linux/plugins/install/#java > > Java plug-in (Sun/Oracle) > > As of Opera 10.50, Opera uses the Java plug-in. Previously Opera used > the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) directly. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8