Peter Pentchev writes:
> Errr, did you actually try with "-0" and "-02"? The gcc flags
> ought to be "-O" and "-O2" - that's the letter "O", not the digit
> "0"...
Yes. Typo mine.
Robert Huff
___
freebsd-po
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 09:57:19AM -0500, Robert Huff wrote:
> Eric Schuele writes:
>
> > On 02/21/2007 19:50, George W. Dinolt wrote:
>
> > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/108776
> > >
> > > Unfortunately, the PR is "closed" because it is "not reproducible". At
> >
> >
Eric Schuele writes:
> On 02/21/2007 19:50, George W. Dinolt wrote:
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/108776
> >
> > Unfortunately, the PR is "closed" because it is "not reproducible". At
>
> Quite reproducible on my machine. :/
And mine, with both "-0" and "
On 02/21/2007 19:50, George W. Dinolt wrote:
Eric:
I too saw the same problem on both 6.2 and current. If one searches the
PR's one can find a reference to this problem.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/108776
Unfortunately, the PR is "closed" because it is "not reproducible".
Eric:
I too saw the same problem on both 6.2 and current. If one searches the
PR's one can find a reference to this problem.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/108776
Unfortunately, the PR is "closed" because it is "not reproducible". At
the bottom of the PR I found the following
Hello Eric,
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, Eric Schuele wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Anyone seeing the following while building the latest wireshark?
Yep. See: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=108892
Can't say much for the responses though :-/
Regards,
Stacey
> Previously had it installed, this was
