Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 11:35:48PM +0100, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
>> I put a lot of effort to get the release done (4 days) before the freeze. So
>> it's kind of frustrating that it doesn't get in.
>
> I sympathize, but if we let one update in, it is very difficult to not let
>
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 11:35:48PM +0100, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
> I put a lot of effort to get the release done (4 days) before the freeze. So
> it's kind of frustrating that it doesn't get in.
I sympathize, but if we let one update in, it is very difficult to not let
them all in. We (portmgr) wil
Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 09:54:54AM +0100, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
>> I hope that when the freeze comes (wasn't that supposed to happen today?) the
>> maintainer updates from before the freeze will still get committed.
>
> No, the idea is that during the freeze period we turn our
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 09:54:54AM +0100, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
> I hope that when the freeze comes (wasn't that supposed to happen today?) the
> maintainer updates from before the freeze will still get committed.
No, the idea is that during the freeze period we turn our attention to
fixing bugs an
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
> I hope that when the freeze comes (wasn't that supposed to happen today?) the
> maintainer updates from before the freeze will still get committed. It seems
> that under the current workload the committing takes a little longer than
> usual.
Hi,
Yeah the tree is frozen act
