Re: running poudriere with 8 builders

2017-03-04 Thread Matthias Apitz
On Saturday, 4 March 2017 17:19:12 CET, Michael Gmelin wrote: I now have made tar-backups of /usr/local/poudiere und /usr/local (without) poudriere; I will umount the 2nd disk (da1) and restore /usr/local, which will end up in the 1st disk; Make sure to initialize poudriere properly on zfs

Re: running poudriere with 8 builders

2017-03-04 Thread Dewayne Geraghty
Set maxvnodes to 50 and jump 100k until you're happy. I have Xeon e3 that uses 800,000 and thats reasonable; but i keep it at load 8 for a two days. Keep an eye on your swap, I set mine to swap out idle stuff early. Thanks for sharing your experience -- *Disclaimer:* *As implied by email

Re: running poudriere with 8 builders

2017-03-04 Thread Michael Gmelin
> On 4 Mar 2017, at 16:32, Matthias Apitz wrote: > >> El día Saturday, March 04, 2017 a las 12:57:40PM +0100, Kurt Jaeger escribió: >> >> Hi! >> Did you use ZFS as file system ? >>> >>> When I did the disk setup, I was also thinking in ZFS, but this would have >>> reduced the netto dis

Re: running poudriere with 8 builders

2017-03-04 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > > Use the same setup, but with ZFS. > > I now have made tar-backups of /usr/local/poudiere und /usr/local > (without) poudriere; I will umount the 2nd disk (da1) and restore > /usr/local, which will end up in the 1st disk; > > about the ZFS I'm unsure; the poudriere.conf says: > > ... > #

Re: running poudriere with 8 builders

2017-03-04 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Saturday, March 04, 2017 a las 12:57:40PM +0100, Kurt Jaeger escribió: > Hi! > > > > Did you use ZFS as file system ? > > > > When I did the disk setup, I was also thinking in ZFS, but this would have > > reduced the netto disk space from 2* 280 GB to the half. > > It does not have to b

Re: running poudriere with 8 builders

2017-03-04 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 12:57:40PM +0100 I heard the voice of Kurt Jaeger, and lo! it spake thus: > > /pou is on an Samsung SSD 840 EVO 250GB: > > smartctl says: > > 9 Power_On_Hours 0x0032 091 091 Always - 41885 > 12 Power_Cycle_Count 0x0032 099 099 Alwa

Re: running poudriere with 8 builders

2017-03-04 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Kurt Jaeger wrote on 2017/03/04 12:57: /pou is on an Samsung SSD 840 EVO 250GB: smartctl says: 9 Power_On_Hours 0x0032 091 091 Always - 41885 12 Power_Cycle_Count 0x0032 099 099 Always - 8 177 Wear_Leveling_Count 0x0013 083 083

Re: running poudriere with 8 builders

2017-03-04 Thread Thomas Zander
On 4 March 2017 at 13:20, Tommi Pernila wrote: > By default MAKE_JOBS is disabled to allow only one process per cpu. To > allow it anyway, ALLOW_MAKE_JOBS=yes in your /usr/local/etc/poudriere.conf: > > echo "ALLOW_MAKE_JOBS=yes" >> /usr/local/etc/poudriere.conf Consider allowing this only for sel

Re: running poudriere with 8 builders

2017-03-04 Thread Tommi Pernila
On Mar 4, 2017 13:57, "Kurt Jaeger" wrote: Hi! > > Did you use ZFS as file system ? > > When I did the disk setup, I was also thinking in ZFS, but this would have > reduced the netto disk space from 2* 280 GB to the half. It does not have to be that way. Use only one disk for the system and the

Re: running poudriere with 8 builders

2017-03-04 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > > Did you use ZFS as file system ? > > When I did the disk setup, I was also thinking in ZFS, but this would have > reduced the netto disk space from 2* 280 GB to the half. It does not have to be that way. Use only one disk for the system and the second disk for a poudriere ZFS pool ? >

Re: running poudriere with 8 builders

2017-03-04 Thread Matthias Apitz
On Saturday, 4 March 2017 12:33:39 CET, Kurt Jaeger wrote: Did you use ZFS as file system ? When I did the disk setup, I was also thinking in ZFS, but this would have reduced the netto disk space from 2* 280 GB to the half. I have / for all.the system and /usr/local for poudriere on the 2

Re: running poudriere with 8 builders

2017-03-04 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > During this time (00:09:20 - 00:33:47) the CPUs are idling and top > shows 8x 'cpdup' (I do not see any man page for this, what proc is > this?). > > The overall throughput now is around 70 ports per hour. And top shows > little CPU usage and a lot of pkg-static processes, perhaps for > unp