On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 06:16:18PM +0100, mato wrote:
>
> Matthew, that is a great answer!!
> Thank you! :-)
>
> The last question would be how to make make(1) /portupgrade/portsystem
> to ignore FORBIDDEN.
>
"make -DNO_IGNORE" will get around this. But bypassing FORBIDDEN is
generally not wise
Matthew Seaman wrote:
> mato wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 13:46:18 +, Vince wrote
>>
>>> mato wrote:
>>>
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:46:24 -0800, Josh Carroll wrote
** Port marked as IGNORE: multimedia/win32-codecs:
is forbidden: Remote c
mato wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 13:46:18 +, Vince wrote
>> mato wrote:
>>> On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:46:24 -0800, Josh Carroll wrote
>>> ** Port marked as IGNORE: multimedia/win32-codecs:
>>> is forbidden: Remote code execution:
>>> http://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/24f6b1eb-43d5-11db-
On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 13:46:18 +, Vince wrote
> mato wrote:
> > On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:46:24 -0800, Josh Carroll wrote
> > ** Port marked as IGNORE: multimedia/win32-codecs:
> > is forbidden: Remote code execution:
> > http://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/24f6b1eb-43d5-11db-81e1-000e0c2e43
mato wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:46:24 -0800, Josh Carroll wrote
> ** Port marked as IGNORE: multimedia/win32-codecs:
> is forbidden: Remote code execution:
> http://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/24f6b1eb-43d5-11db-81e1-000e0c2e438a.html
>
> Isn't this behaviour flawed ?? Or am
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:46:24 -0800, Josh Carroll wrote
> > >> ** Port marked as IGNORE: multimedia/win32-codecs:
> > >> is forbidden: Remote code execution:
> > >> http://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/24f6b1eb-43d5-11db-81e1-000e0c2e438a.html
> > >>
> > >> Isn't this behaviour flawed ?? Or am I missing
>> ** Port marked as IGNORE: multimedia/win32-codecs:
>> is forbidden: Remote code execution:
>> http://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/24f6b1eb-43d5-11db-81e1-000e0c2e438a.html
>>
>> Isn't this behaviour flawed ?? Or am I missing something ?
You need to make config in /usr/ports/multimedia/win32-cod
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 10:55:40PM +0100, martinko wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> According to freshports.org the newest multimedia/win32-codecs port
>> (3.1.0.r1,1) is not vulnerable. I'm trying to upgrade version
>> win32-codecs-3.1.0.p8,1 on my system but portupgrade + portaudit
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 10:55:40PM +0100, martinko wrote:
> Hello,
>
> According to freshports.org the newest multimedia/win32-codecs port
> (3.1.0.r1,1) is not vulnerable. I'm trying to upgrade version
> win32-codecs-3.1.0.p8,1 on my system but portupgrade + portaudit refuse
> me to do so:
>
>
