Re: ports back channel Re: perl5.16->5.18

2014-12-03 Thread Russell L. Carter
Hi Mathieu, Thank you for responding. I've thought about this over the last few days a bit, and I first want to commend you for the large efforts you and your collaborators are making to improve the port system. Already I have noticed positive changes, very impressive. Further comments inline.

Re: ports back channel Re: perl5.16->5.18

2014-12-02 Thread Mathieu Arnold
+--On 28 novembre 2014 20:47:18 -0700 "Russell L. Carter" wrote: | The little major one is, a perl5 upgrade should not require | rebuilding ~2/3 of the ports tree. Maybe I'm off a bit, but | I don't think by a material amount. This turns out to be the | minor problem. I don't actually care, a