On 01/01/2011 15:46, marco wrote:
I'll be eagerly awaiting the implementation.
voila! I managed to squeeze it into 3.6, enjoy.
Doug
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 12:03:39PM -0800, you (Doug Barton) sent the following
to [freebsd-ports] :
> On 01/01/2011 11:44, b. f. wrote:
> > On 1/1/11, Doug Barton wrote:
> >> On 12/31/2010 18:40, b. f. wrote:
> >>
> >>> You don't need to go to those lengths. You could just add a
> >>> command-li
On 01/01/2011 12:15, b. f. wrote:
On 1/1/11, Doug Barton wrote:
On 01/01/2011 11:44, b. f. wrote:
On 1/1/11, Doug Barton wrote:
On 12/31/2010 18:40, b. f. wrote:
...
and that
NO_PACKAGE may preclude your use of 'make package' with -g in
portmaster (at least without some workaround like FO
On 1/1/11, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 01/01/2011 11:44, b. f. wrote:
>> On 1/1/11, Doug Barton wrote:
>>> On 12/31/2010 18:40, b. f. wrote:
...
>> and that
>> NO_PACKAGE may preclude your use of 'make package' with -g in
>> portmaster (at least without some workaround like FORCE_PACKAGE).
>
> Differ
On 01/01/2011 11:44, b. f. wrote:
On 1/1/11, Doug Barton wrote:
On 12/31/2010 18:40, b. f. wrote:
You don't need to go to those lengths. You could just add a
command-line switch, or a check for a cookie (.buildme or .nopkg, say)
in the corresponding PORT_DBDIR subdirector(y|ies), or both, t
On 1/1/11, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 12/31/2010 18:40, b. f. wrote:
>
>> You don't need to go to those lengths. You could just add a
>> command-line switch, or a check for a cookie (.buildme or .nopkg, say)
>> in the corresponding PORT_DBDIR subdirector(y|ies), or both, to allow
>> the user to ind
On 12/31/2010 18:40, b. f. wrote:
You don't need to go to those lengths. You could just add a
command-line switch, or a check for a cookie (.buildme or .nopkg, say)
in the corresponding PORT_DBDIR subdirector(y|ies), or both, to allow
the user to indicate to portmaster that it should always bu
On 01/01/2011 06:50, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 01/01/2011 01:50, Doug Barton wrote:
If someone can come up with a programmatic way of determining if such
settings exist in ports.conf I'd be willing to consider adding the
support, but given the wide variety of syntax that is supported I think
such
On 01/01/2011 01:50, Doug Barton wrote:
> If someone can come up with a programmatic way of determining if such
> settings exist in ports.conf I'd be willing to consider adding the
> support, but given the wide variety of syntax that is supported I think
> such a thing would be difficult.
There's
Doug Barton wrote:
On 12/31/2010 01:10, marco wrote:
Here is what i'd like to achieve:
use portmaster with the -P option (using PM_PACKAGES=first in
/usr/local/etc/portmaster.rc) to have a package installed if
available,_but_ when a port matches a port I've defined in
/usr/local/etc/ports.conf
> On 12> On 12/31/2010 01:10, marco wrote:
> > Here is what i'd like to achieve:
> >
> > use portmaster with the -P option (using PM_PACKAGES=first in
> > /usr/local/etc/portmaster.rc) to have a package installed if
> > available,_but_ when a port matches a port I've defined in
> > /usr/local/etc/
On 12/31/2010 02:51, Alex Dupre wrote:
Package support in portmaster is a bit limited ATM, for example it
installs build dendencies even if it find an already compiled
package.
I think I would take issue with "limited." :) Yes, the behavior you're
describing is sub-optimal, and I'm looking at
On 12/31/2010 01:10, marco wrote:
Here is what i'd like to achieve:
use portmaster with the -P option (using PM_PACKAGES=first in
/usr/local/etc/portmaster.rc) to have a package installed if
available,_but_ when a port matches a port I've defined in
/usr/local/etc/ports.conf to use certain make
marco ha scritto:
Is that achievable using the portmaster and portconf ports?
I don't think it's possible (and if you use local produced packages with
the same options in ports.conf?). Package support in portmaster is a bit
limited ATM, for example it installs build dendencies even if it find
14 matches
Mail list logo
