On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:41:32 -0400
Chuck Robey wrote:
> I'm making no mistake tho, moved from
> portmanager to portmaster) which doesn't seem to have this uneveness,
> so while it takes a whole lot longer to work than portmanager (it
> uses slow but sure shell utils for it's databases)
I don't k
On 09/08/10 18:15, Jerry wrote:
Portmanager did have a nasty bug that involved looping. It was fixed
ages ago though. Are you running the latest version; i.e., "0.4.1_9" on
your system? Run "portmanager -v" to confirm.
Without the '-p' option, portmanager only looks 1 level deep. with the
'-p'
On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:41:32 -0400
Chuck Robey articulated:
> On 08/26/10 01:17, jhell wrote:
> > On 08/25/2010 21:27, Chuck Robey wrote:
> >> I have an interesting thing here: I seem to have found an endless
> >> loop in portmanager. It's *entirely* possible that I'm myself
> >> causing this, s
On 08/26/10 01:17, jhell wrote:
On 08/25/2010 21:27, Chuck Robey wrote:
I have an interesting thing here: I seem to have found an endless loop in
portmanager. It's *entirely* possible that I'm myself causing this, so I'll
explain, and if you can come up with any hints, I'll be happy to test the
On 08/25/2010 21:27, Chuck Robey wrote:
> I have an interesting thing here: I seem to have found an endless loop in
> portmanager. It's *entirely* possible that I'm myself causing this, so I'll
> explain, and if you can come up with any hints, I'll be happy to test them,
> because I really do like
