Re: math/R maintenance

2016-06-04 Thread Fernando Herrero Carrón
Hi, I submitted a new patch for math/R 3.3.0 ( https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207425). Could someone please take look at it? Thanks a lot! 2016-05-22 22:31 GMT+02:00 Fernando Herrero Carrón : > > El 22 may. 2016 11:59 a. m., "Kurt Jaeger" escribió: > > > > Hi! > > > > > > Ig

Re: math/R maintenance

2016-05-22 Thread Fernando Herrero Carrón
El 22 may. 2016 11:59 a. m., "Kurt Jaeger" escribió: > > Hi! > > > > Ignore that, it was a simple ${PORTSDIR} removal. I'm testing right now. > > > Thanks a lot, Kurt. I am rechecking in any case to see if it still works. > > Turns out, there are quite a few other sleeper PRs for R, > for example

Re: math/R maintenance

2016-05-22 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > > Ignore that, it was a simple ${PORTSDIR} removal. I'm testing right now. > Thanks a lot, Kurt. I am rechecking in any case to see if it still works. Turns out, there are quite a few other sleeper PRs for R, for example the one to update to 3.3.0. Can you provide a patch that's working w

Re: math/R maintenance

2016-05-22 Thread Fernando Herrero Carrón
Hi, 2016-05-22 11:40 GMT+02:00 Kurt Jaeger : > Hi! > > > I've tested the patch, it does no longer apply cleanly. Can you > > update the patch and add it to > > > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207425 > > > > Then I can test and commit it, with maintainer timeout 8-} > > Igno

Re: math/R maintenance

2016-05-22 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > I've tested the patch, it does no longer apply cleanly. Can you > update the patch and add it to > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207425 > > Then I can test and commit it, with maintainer timeout 8-} Ignore that, it was a simple ${PORTSDIR} removal. I'm testing right

Re: math/R maintenance

2016-05-22 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > Some time ago I submitted a patch [1] to add some optimization related > options to math/R (choose with BLAS library to link against and add LTO, > basically). The PR has not received much attention since then, and the > maintainer hasn't replied to my emails either. I've tested the patch,