On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 11:19:04PM +0700, budsz wrote:
> So the best way I should upgrade my system to FreeBSD 6.X series?,
Yes, that is what we have been recommending for some time now.
> BTW which one:
>
> "tag=RELEASE_4_EOL" or "tag=RELEASE_4" ?, I've already read in
> handbook and didn't fin
On 7/3/07, Sergey Matveychuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
tag=RELEASE_4_EOL is older.
So the best way I should upgrade my system to FreeBSD 6.X series?, BTW
which one:
"tag=RELEASE_4_EOL" or "tag=RELEASE_4" ?, I've already read in
handbook and didn't find exactly "tag=RELEASE_4_EOL" :-(
Thanks
budsz wrote:
On 7/3/07, Sergey Matveychuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
budsz wrote:
> Where's I should find that INDEX.bz2?, is that possible I'am still
> running FreeBSD 4.X with ports collection uptodate too (Of couse with
No. Sorry.
You can use only ports tree with cvs tag RELEASE_4_EOL. Qui
On 7/3/07, Sergey Matveychuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
budsz wrote:
> Where's I should find that INDEX.bz2?, is that possible I'am still
> running FreeBSD 4.X with ports collection uptodate too (Of couse with
No. Sorry.
You can use only ports tree with cvs tag RELEASE_4_EOL. Quite obsoleted
h
budsz wrote:
Where's I should find that INDEX.bz2?, is that possible I'am still
running FreeBSD 4.X with ports collection uptodate too (Of couse with
No. Sorry.
You can use only ports tree with cvs tag RELEASE_4_EOL. Quite obsoleted
however.
--
Dixi.
Sem.
__